For Romanian, I suggest reaching out to User:Klaul who lead this research project on NPOV: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Grounding_NPOV_pillar_in_post-censored_information_ecology

In T389445#10669368, @Strainu wrote:

For Romanian, I suggest reaching out to User:Klaul who lead this research project on NPOV: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Grounding_NPOV_pillar_in_post-censored_information_ecology

Thank you, I shared it with the team!

Hi, I added some templates and policies from Spanish Wikipedia. Do we need to add a policy (if it is available) about non-sexist language?. I'll ask some power users about jargon in edit summaries.

@Superzerocool I see an edit conflict—let me know when you’re done. :)

In T389445#10675289, @Bachounda wrote:

@Superzerocool I see an edit conflict—let me know when you’re done. :)

I'm done. Please, continue :) (I'll copy my links if there is something wrong ;))

I found these templates from this page in arwp https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AA%D8%B5%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%81:%D9%82%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8_%D8%B5%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%AA%D9%88%D9%89

In T389445#10675273, @Superzerocool wrote:

Hi, I added some templates and policies from Spanish Wikipedia. Do we need to add a policy (if it is available) about non-sexist language?. I'll ask some power users about jargon in edit summaries.

Thank you for your help!
Please add any policy that fits your community's definition of NPOV.

@Msz2001, thank you for your help! Can you add the parameter(s) used for {{Dopracować}} specific to neutrality issues? I identified pov, zależne, and reklama, but I prefer to rely on your expertise. :)

Thank you @Amire80! Are there any templates used to mark pages for promotional/tone issues at he.wp?

In T389445#10670032, @Trizek-WMF wrote:

In T389445#10669368, @Strainu wrote:

For Romanian, I suggest reaching out to User:Klaul who lead this research project on NPOV: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Grounding_NPOV_pillar_in_post-censored_information_ecology

Thank you, I shared it with the team!

@Strainu, meanwhile, could you start filling the table for Romanian Wikipedia please?

Thank you, @Wkee4ager! Does no.wp use templates and edit summary jargon?

Thank you @Msz2001!

In T389445#10678410, @Trizek-WMF wrote:

Thank you, @Wkee4ager! Does no.wp use templates and edit summary jargon?

The two templates listed are the ones I could think of. I'm not very aquainted with the jargon, but "egenreklame, npov, objektivitet, reklame" might have been used. I'll update the description.

Thank you @Wkee4ager!

A suggestion for everyone -- please share this task with your community if you think it is worth the effort: the more precise terms we have listed, the better the model would be.

I added policies and templates from Chinese Wikipedia. Additionally, there are filters in place to detect Peacock and promotional tone, including: AF89 (Words about fictional Character traits), AF157 (Promotional tone), AF229 (Peacock terms related to actors/singer).

Many thanks to everyone who took part in this inventory!

We really appreciate the time and effort you put into gathering templates and terms for this project. Thank you!

If you are curious about the next steps, please add your names to T388471: Invite volunteers to review Peacock language model (v1): we are looking for testers for the model that will be built using the data you gathered!

Hi, I noticed a discrepancy in terminology in the task description:

The requirements mention

templates used on articles to mark a non-neutral sentence/section

while the column of the table is

Templates used on articles (top or section templates)

@Trizek-WMF Could we also add the info about template levels (inline/sentence, section, or top/article-level) for each template listed in the table? This would be very helpful. For the peacock check model specifically, inline/sentence-level templates are particularly valuable since they precisely locate problematic text within articles.

In T389445#10812005, @achou wrote:

Hi, I noticed a discrepancy in terminology in the task description:

The requirements mention

templates used on articles to mark a non-neutral sentence/section

while the column of the table is

Templates used on articles (top or section templates)

@Trizek-WMF Could we also add the info about template levels (inline/sentence, section, or top/article-level) for each template listed in the table? This would be very helpful. For the peacock check model specifically, inline/sentence-level templates are particularly valuable since they precisely locate problematic text within articles.

Good catch, I'll ask for a review.

In-line templates are (in theory) listed below https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q13421531. A few of them have been added to the task description. They can be more precise if they encapsulate the sentence ( like in {{template|Sentence}}) but

1. some templates listed don't allow encapsulation
2. they are sometimes (often?) used at the end of a sentence or a whole paragraph (Sentence{{template}}).

I see that some languages (like French) have banners that are used for both article-level and section-level tagging. Do you have a way to detect where the template is located?

@Trizek-WMF Thanks!
Yes, there is a way. We can parse wikitext and check if the template is in the top or in the middle of the article.

Another question: I noticed the languages listed here aren't exactly the same as in T388471. There are additional languages hy (Armenian), mk (Macedonian), uz (Uzbek) that aren't listed in this task. Also, lv (Latvian) appears here but isn't listed in T388471. Should we align these language lists?