User talk:DeclanMiner2023

Hello!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hand-drawn electronics (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hand-drawn electronics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DeclanMiner2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, DeclanMiner2023, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

DeclanMiner2023, good luck, and have fun. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Electrofluid

Portal:Electrofluid, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Electrofluid and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Electrofluid during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 07:27, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete it, it was a failure anyway.

"Just another wasted piece of space on Wiki's storage" DeclanMiner2023 (talk) 00:51, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Data storage library (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Data storage library and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 18:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone else just make it before me? Just delete this page. I suck at this, and I honestly hate myself for even trying, and I will not try again probably in a long time. I will leave you wikipedia guys alone. Goodbye DeclanMiner2023 (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JCalculate (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JCalculate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Fine

DELETE IT DeclanMiner2023 (talk) 03:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fraction

Hi @DeclanMiner2023, and welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted your edits to fraction. The first change you made (1284683041) to Fraction § Proper and improper fractions, with an example, seemed like a good idea, so at first I tightened up the example in place, but then I realized that there's already a similar example at § Mixed numbers, so I replaced it with an intra-article link to that section instead. I don't understand what was going on with your next edit (special:diff/1284687201), where the section § Proper and improper fractions was chopped into two parts with half moved to a different section, and a source deleted. I'm guessing some of that was a mistake? Anyway, it didn't seem like a minor edit, and your edit summary didn't make clear what the intention was. I reverted it. Feel free to make further edits to the page, or start a discussion at talk:Fraction. All the best. –jacobolus (t) 07:07, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]