Final Siphon Presentation (New)
Final Siphon Presentation (New)
Suitability – economics and other considerations determine the feasibility of using a siphon over other
types of structures, at the given location . If the canal bed level (CBL) is sufficiently above the design flood level
of the drainage channel, an elevated flume will be a possible alternative. If the difference between CB and
drainage bed level (DBL) is not significant, canal siphon is the best choice. To maintain levels and geometrics of
railways and roads, canal siphon becomes a better alternatives. If the CBL is sufficiently above the road/railway
level to provide enough clearance for the vehicles, or in case of a local depression, canal water can as well be
conveyed through an elevated flume.
Generally, a drainage siphon (conveying drain water below the canal by a siphon) is not recommended
because of the possibility of it getting choked due to sediment, debris, floating trees etc. thus endangering the
safety of the canal bank work.
Advantages and disadvantages
Main advantage of a canal siphon is that it provides an unobstructed waterway for drainage channel
which is important in a country like Philippines where floating logs and trees are a common feature during
floods associated with typhoons. As the waterway is not obstructed , lowering of foundations at abutments and
piers (to take care of deeper scouring a such locations) is not necessary. Roads and railways can maintain
their levels and geometrics when canal siphons are utilized.
One disadvantage of a siphon is the high head loss involved as compared to that of an elevated flume . It
results into corresponding loss of command for a contour canal or involves extra expenditures to increase the
canal length to maintain the net service area.
Desilting may also cause maintenance problem at some locations. Possibility of choking due to floating
trash, and hazard to life can be reduced by providing trash rack.
Another disadvantage of a canal siphon across a drainage is that a road crossing (paved dip,
submersible bridge or high level bridge) has to be provided for service road, becoming an additional
expenditure item to be considered in working out costs alternatives. An elevated flume can on the other hand
be combined with a bridge over the top slab conveniently, and at much less extra cost.
Before making a decision, all these points are to be considered, weighed carefully and in case of
important structures cost estimates for possible alternatives should be also made.
Data requirement
Canal Data
i) Canal elements, section properties and elevation upstream and downstream of the structure.
ii) Available drop ( head loss) as per canal profile sheet.
iii) Details of lining provided if any.
iv) Profile along canal center line on either side of the structure, for a distance of 60 to 100m
v) Contour plan around the site
vi) Specific requirements for the type of drainage channel crossing for the service road (low level
cause way, submersible bridge or high level bridge etc.)
ii) Conduit
Rectangular closed conduit are to be designed for internal pressure as well as to
withstand external backfill pressure.
v) Freeboard
Extra freeboard at the siphons is provided.
ii) For cross-drainage works, minimum cover shall be1 m and even more if retrogression is anticipated
iii) Minimum cover of 0.2 m for crossing below a lined canal and 0.6 m below an unlined canal shall provided.
Head loss through structure
Inverted siphon works on differential head and it is necessary to check that hydraulic losses through the
structure balance the head loss provided at the structure in the canal profile
For minimum hydraulic loss, it is desirable to provide a seal of 1.5 hv (one and half times the change in
velocity head) with a maximum of 0.1 m at the inlet over the crown of the conduit preferably no submergence at
the conduit outlet. If the submerge at the outlet exceeds 1/6th of height of opening, coefficient of head loss
increases from 0.7 to 1.0
Transitions
Vertical transitions in the bed profile of the siphon shall not be steeper than 1V in 4 H at entry and 1 V
in 6 H at exit. A tangential curve should be provided at the entry, exit and the bottom of siphon at change of
slopes.
For small structures, broken back transitions serve the purpose. But for large discharges it is preferable
to provide curved transition walls so as to reduce the had loss and to ensure streamline flow especially at he
outlet transition, which reduces turbulence, formation of eddies and hence erosion.
SAMPLE COMPUTATION
CANAL ELEMENTS
ABOVE BELOW
Q= 3.80
cms.
V= 0.65 m/s S
A= 5.76 m2
b= 3.00 m. A
d= 1.20 m.
D= 1.70 m. M
r= 0.7862
t= E
S= 0.00037
Ss = 1.5:1
n= 0.025
TB = 204.20 203.70
WS = 203.70 203.20
b) DRAINAGE -- Bed level 200.00 m
Design flood level = 202.90
Scour level = 197.70
Bed Material – sand, gravel and boulders
Existing bed width = 50 m
Banks – Stable, in erodible, slopes = 1:1
Angle of internal friction for backfill = 30º
El. 204.45
TB. = 204.20
EL. = 203.90 TB. = 203.70
WS. = 203.70
DFL = 202.90 WS. = 203.20
CB. = 202.50
CB. = 202.00
50.00m
El. 200.00m
El. 199.40
60.00m
El. 204.45
TB. = 204.20 EL. = 203.90
WS. = 203.70 TB. = 203.70
DFL = 202.90 WS. = 203.20
CB. = 202.50
CB. = 202.00
50.00m
El. 200.00m 24
El. 199.40 2. 1
2
60.00m
Q = velocity x b x d
b = 3.80 / ( 2 x 1.20 )
b = 1.583 or say 1.60 m. 0.15 1.30 0.15
C. Computations of Headlosses
i) Inlet transition loss -
Assuming broken back transition, K will be 0.30 for inlet and 0.50 for outlet transition.
Inlet transition loss, hi = Ki (hvs - hva)
hi = 0.30 ( 0.21 - 0.02 )
= 0.057 m.
ii) Outlet transition loss
Outlet transition loss, ho = Ko (hvs - h vb)
= 0.014 m.
Usually 10% addition is made to these losses as safety factor to ensure that there is no heading
water up of on the U/S of siphon.
Probable loss = 0.513 x 1.10
= 0.564 m > Available head = 0.50 Not OK
As available headloss is only 0.50 m, one alternative is to redesign the section assuming slightly low
velocity of flow. But another acceptable alternative would be to retain the section and allow some heading of water
up to 0.03 to 0.08 m ( 0.512 - 0.50 to 0.58 - 0.50 )which is not very significant and can be taken care of by the
increased freeboard on the upstream side.
This extra freeboard be provided for a length of 50m. On the U/S canal bank level.
Canal bank level on D/S = 202.00 + 1.20 + 0.50 = 203.70
Which is 0.80m. (203.70 – 202.90) above the design flood level for the drainage and hence may be
increased to 203.90 to get FB of 1m. Over the design flood level.
Inlet Transition
Minimum seal of 1.50 hv or 10 cm. whichever is greater shall be provided over the barrel opening.
204.45
204.20
203.70
0.29 m. >1.5hv or 10 cm. which is more
1.20 m.
202.50 1.34 m. Ø
m.
0
1.2
2
Barrel Height 1
height of opening =
cos A1
m.
0
202.07
1.2
2
1
Invert level of barrel at the starting point
= 203.70 - 0.29 - 1.34 = 202.07
203.20
0.16
1.20
Ø 1.34 202.00
1.20 201.70
2
1
Max difference in invert levels of outlet transition = 1/2 barrel height (opening)
= ( 1/ 2 ) x ( 1.34 )
= 0.67 m.
203.90
203.55
203.20
> 1/6 barrel opening 0.16 m.
1.20
Ø 1.34 202.00
201.70 0.43m
1.20
2
1
To begin with, provide a drop of 0.43 m., i.e. same as with the inlet transition
Then the total water depth at the d/s face wall = 1.20 + 0.43 = 1.63
Seal = 1.63 - 1.34 = 0.29 m > 0.22 m Not OK
1/6th of height of opening = 1.34 / 6 = 0.22 m
As the submergence is more than 1/6 of the opening, the invert of the transition at the face wall
may be raised to 201.70.
Seal will be
Seal = 203.20 - 201.70 - 1.34 = 0.16m.
which is less than 0.22 m. and hence acceptable.
Inlet Transition Outlet Transition
5 m. 6 m.
1.80 m.
3.00 m. 1.6 m.
1.80 m.
width of the flume portion = 1.60
Water surface width of cutoff = 3 + 1.20 x 1.5 x 2 = 6.60
0.22 m.
1.20 m.
1.66 m.
1.6 m.
0.24 m.
0.24 m. 0.24 m.
2.08 m.
Check for flotation condition
0.22 m.
a) Increase thickness of floor and side walls so that the uplift is balanced by the dead weight.
b) Fill bottom 0.3 m of the barrel with sand and gravel before starting of concreting of the sides.
c) Keep 3-4 holes in the side walls so that water will find way inside the structure will not float.
These holes shall be plugged after completing the construction.
If these measures are not properly attended to during construction and the
water on the outside starts rising due to failure of pumps etc. the barrel would float
unless water has access to the inside of the barrel through holes, or wt. of barrel is
increased by filling sand and gravel. These points shall be specifically noted on
construction drawing in all such cases and should not be lost sight of by the field staff.
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF SIPHON BARREL
Allowable stresses are assumed as below fc’ = 250 kg/cm²
fc = 85 kg/cm² R = 14kg/cm² n = 9.2
fs = 1270 kg/cm² K = 0.38 j = 0.873
Internal dimensions of the barrel are 1.60 m wide and 1.20 m in height.
Submerged (buoyant) wt. of soil = Saturated unit wt. of soil – unit wt. of water
water =
1000 kg/cu m
Well compacted dry earth =
Saturated1900
well kg/cu m
compacted earth = 2200
kg/cu m
Reinforced concrete =
2400 kg/cu m
Natural dry earth Soil particle sp.
= 1600 kg/cu m gravity = 2.65
Saturated natural earth = 2000
void kg/cu
ratio =m40%
0.50
2.90 EL. 202.40
1.20 1.43
1.66 1.43
1.84
This loading being higher that 4220 kg/sqm it shall be taken for all computations.
= wt. of barrel/rm – wt. of volume of water displaced by the barrel/rm + buoyant wt.
of soil r/m
= (3679 – 2.08 x 1.66 x 1000) + (2000 – 1000) x 3 x 2.08
= 6466 / rm
= 6466 / 2.08
= 3109 kg/sqm
= 7693 kg/sqm
Pressure acting on side wall
EL. 202.90
0.50 Water
EL. 202.40
Saturated
3.11 soil
EL. 199.29
A B
1.43
1.84
C D EL. 197.86
pressure
pressure
Bouyant
Water
soil
Pressure at A, B =(1- sin ø /1+ sin ø) x (2000 –1000) x 3.11 + 1000 x 3.61
Where ø = 30˚
= 1/3 X 1000 X 3.11 + 3610
= 4647 kg/sqm
Pressure at C, D = 1/3 x 4.54 (2000 – 1000) + 1000 x 5.04
= 6553 kg/sqm
Pressure Diagram
7028 kg/m²
4647
A B
1.43
1.84
C D
6553 kg/m²
4647
1906
7693 kg/m²
Pressure Diagram
Fixing moments 7028 kg/m²
4647
On span AB = wL²/12 = 7028 x 1.84² / 12 = 1983 kgm A B
4647
1906
= wL²/12 = 4647 x 1.43²/12792kgm
= kg/m²
7693 kg/m²
MAC = MBD = 792 + 130 = 922 `kgm 987 kgm C D 987 kgm
MCA = MDB = 792 + 195 = 987 kgm 2170 kgm 2170 kgm
Stiffness:
L = Length in cm 0.22
A B
b = 1 m = 100 cm
d = t (thickness) in cm
1.20 1.43
KAB = 1/12 (b) (tAB)³/ LAB
1.84
= 1/12 (100) (22)³/(1.84 X
100)= 482cm³ = KAB 0.24
C D
A B D C
AC AB BA BD DB DC CD CA
DF 0.63 0.37 0.37 0.63 0.56 0.44 0.44 0.56
M -922 1983 -1983 922 -987 2170 -2170 987
1ST. DF -668 -393 393 668 -662 -521 521 662
C.O. 331 196 -196 -331 334 260 -260 -334
2ND. DF -332 -195 195 332 -333 -261 261 333
C.O. 166 98 -98 -166 166 130 -130 -166
3RD. DF -166 -98 98 166 -166 -130 130 166
M total -1591 1591 -1591 1591 -1648 1648 -1648 1648
Reactions and Maximum Positive Moments
a) Top Slab –- Net moment at the center of the member
1591 1591
kgm kgm
b) Floor Slab – Net moment at the center
7078kgs
M = Wfs L² /8
1608 kgm = 7693 (1.84)² /8 -1648
= 1608 kgm
1648 1648
kgm kgm
c) Side walls – Net moment near the center
X
Taking moments at point C we get,
1.43 RA – 4647(1.43)² /2 - (6553 – 4647) (1.43)² /(2x3)
6553
+ 1648 – 1591 = 0
4647
1648 1591 RA = {4647(1.43)² /2 + (1906) (1.43² /6) - 1648 + 1591)} /1.43
C A
kgm 1.43 m. kgm
= 3737 kgs
RC = 4271kgs. RA = 3737kgs.
X
= 4271 kgs
-1608 -1608
kgm kgm
Point of Zero Shear
X by ratio and proportion
X = 0.73
Wx 6553 - 4647
=
6553
Wx
X 1.43
4647
1648 1591 Wx = 1333 X = 973
C A
kgm 1.43 m. kgm
Section x -- x
RC = 4271kgs. RA = 3737kgs.
X
Taking summation of horizontal forces
above X –- X we get,
RA – Wx X/2 – 4647 X = 0
Substituting the value of Wx in the equation we get,
3737 – 1333 (X/2) – 4647 X = 0
X² + 6.97 X – 5.60 = 0
- 188 kgm X = 0.73 m.
Maximum Moment
Mx = 3737 (0.73) - (0.73)(4647)(1/2) (0.73) - (1/2)(0.73) (973) (1/3) (0.73)
-1648 -1591 -1591
kgm kgm
Mx = -188 kgm
Summary of Reaction and Moments
6466 kg 6466 kg
+1383 kgm
3737 kg 3737 kg
A B -1591 A B
-1591
kgm kgm
-188 -188
1.43
kgm kgm
1.84 -1648 -1648
kgm kgm
4271 kg C D 4271 kg C D
√
M
d=
- M = 1591 kgm; + M = 1393 kgm. R.b
√
d= 1591 (100)
= 10.66 cm say 11 cm
14 (100)
It is preferable to provide thickness of 20 cms and hence more thickness has been provided here.)
2) Bottom Slab
√
d= 1648 (100)
= 10.84 cm say 11 cm
14 (100)
3) Side wall
-M = 1648 kgm;
√
d= 1648 (100)
= 10.84 cm say 11 cm
14 (100)
2. Positive Reinforcement
-As =1383 kgmx 100/(1270x 0.873x 14) =8.91 cm²
AST = 0.002 x b x t = 4.40 cm² Spacing of Reinforcement; Used 1.00 cm Ø; A = 0.78 cm²
b) Sidewalls
S = 3737 / (100) (16) = 2.34 kg/cm²
c) Bottom slab
S = 7078/ (100) (16) = 4.42 kg/cm²
As the shear stress in all cases is within permissible limits, no
shear reinforcement is necessary.
To reduce concentration of stress at the corners and to increase fixity at the corners, fillets are usually
provided in all the four corners and some nominal reinforcement is provided at the corners. The siphon barrel in
this example is smaller in size and relative thickness of members is more hence fillets may not be considered
necessary . But for barrels of large size it is desirable to provide fillets.
Conditions No. 2
When there is no earth pressure or water pressure on the outer side of barrel
but barrel is flowing with full capacity.
4520 kg/sqm
= 4520– 0.22x 2400
= 3992 kg/sqm
Pressure Diagram
Pressure on floor slab = w h
= 1000(203.70– 197.98) A B
= 5720 kg/sqm
3992 kg/sqm
Total wt, of barrel with water
= [ 2 x 1.66 x 0.24 + 1.6 (0.22+ 0.24) ]x 2400 + 1.6 x 1.2 x 1000 3028 kg/sqm
= 5599 kg/sqm (kg per running water of barrel) C D
5599
5720 kg/sqm
= = 2692 kg/sqm
2.08
M = WTS L² /12
A B
= 3992 (1.84)² /12 = 1126kgm
2) On span CD (bottom slab) 3992 kg/sqm
1.43
M = WBS L² /12
3028 kg/sqm
= 3028 (1.84)² /12 = 854kgm
3) On span AC & BD: C D
5720
- i) due to rectangular loading
kg/sqm
M = WL² /12 Fixed end Moments
= 4520 (1.43)² /12 = 770kgm Diagram
ii) Due to triangular loading 1126kgm 1126kgm
MBD = MAC = W L²/30 = 1200 (1.43)² / 30 = 82kgm 852 kgm A B 852 kgm
MDB = MCA = W L²/20 = 1200 (1.43)² / 20 = 123kgm
Total fixed end moments on spa n AC and BD will be
MBD = MAC= 770 + 82 = 852 kgm
MDB = MCA = 770 + 123 = 893 kgm 893 kgm C D 893 kgm
854kgm 854kgm
Moment Distribution
A B D C
DF 0.63 0.37 0.37 0.63 0.56 0.44 0.44 0.56
M -852 1126 -1126 852 -893 854 -854 893
1ST. DF -173 -101 101 173 22 17 -17 -22
C.O. -11 50 -50 11 86 -8 8 -86
2ND. DF -25 -14 14 25 -44 -34 34 44
C.O. 22 7 -7 -22 12 17 -17 -12
3RD. DF -18 -11 11 18 -16 -13 13 16
C.O. 8 5 -5 -8 9 7 -7 -9
4th. DF -8 -5 5 8 -9 -7 7 9
M total -1057 1057 -1057 1057 -833 833 -833 833
Reactions and Maximum Positive Moments
a) Top Slab –- Net moment at the center of the member
3673kgs.
Maximum Positive Moment
M = Wts L²/8 -
1057
632 kgm
= 3992 (1.84)²/8 – 1057
= 632 kgm
1057 1057
kgm kgm
c) Side walls – Net moment near the center
X
Taking moments at point C we get,
1.43 RA – 4520(1.43)² /2 - (5720 – 4520) (1.43)² /(2x3)
5720
- 1057 + 833 = 0
4520
833 1057 RA = {4520(1.43)² /2 + (1200) (1.43² /6) + 1057- 833)} /1.43
C A
kgm 1.43 m. kgm
= 3674 kgs
RC = 3647kgs. RA = 3674kgs.
X
= 3647 kgs
-833 -1057
kgm kgm
Point of Zero Shear
X by ratio and proportion
X = 0.76
Wx 5720 - 4520
=
5720
Wx
X 1.43
4520
833 1057 Wx = 839 X = 638
C A
kgm 1.43 m. kgm
Section x -- x
RC = 3647kgs. RA = 3674kgs.
X
Taking summation of horizontal forces
above X –- X we get,
RA – Wx X/2 – 4520 X = 0
Substituting the value of Wx in the equation we get,
3674 – 839X (X/2) – 4520 X = 0
3674 – 419.50 X² – 4520 X = 0
X = 0.76 m.
368kgm
Maximum Moment
Mx = 3674 (0.76) - (0.76)(4520)(1/2) (0.76) - (1/2)(0.76) (638) (1/3) (0.76)
-833 -1057 -1057
kgm kgm
Mx = 368kgm
b) Bottom Slab– Net moment at the center
2786kgs
M = Wfs L² /8
448 kgm = 3028 (1.84)² /8 -833
= 448 kgm
833 833
kgm kgm
Summary of Reaction and Moments
3673 kg 3673 kg
-1057 -1057
3673 kg 3674 kg kgm kgm
A B A B
3647 kg C D 3647 kg C D
- 833 - 833
kgm kgm
2786 kg 2786 kg
Calculations of reinforcement to resist internal loading
a) Top Slab M
As =
fs j d
1. Negative Reinforcement
-As =1057 kgmx 100/(1270x 0.873x 14) =6.81 cm²
AØ (100)
Spacing of Reinforcement; Used 1.20 cm Ø; A = 1.13 cm² Sp =
- AS
1.13 (100) =16.59 cm Provide 12 mm Sp. 16 cm
Sp =
6.81
2. Positive Reinforcement
-As =632 kgm x 100/(1270x 0.873x 14) =4.07 cm²
2) Positive Reinforcement
AST= 0.002x 100x 24= 4.80 cm² Spacing of Reinforcement; Used 1.00 cm Ø; A = 0.78 cm²
0.78 (100)
Sp = = 16.25 cmProvide 10 mm Sp. 16
4.80
cm
c) Sidewalls
1) Negative BM
-As =1057 kgmx 100/(1270x 0.873x 16) =5.96 cm² (At the top side)
Spacing of Reinforcement; Used 1.20 cm Ø; A = 1.13 cm²
1.13 (100)
Sp = = 18.96 cm Provide 12 mm Sp. 18 cm
5.96
-As =833 kgm x 100/(1270x 0.873x 16) =4.70 cm² (At the lower side)
Spacing of Reinforcement; Used 1.20 cm Ø; A = 1.13 cm²
1.13 (100)
Sp = = 24.04 cm Provide 12 mm Sp. 24 cm
4.70
2) Positive reinforcement
-As =368 kgmx 100/(1270x 0.873x 16) =2.07 cm²
Spacing of Reinforcement; Used 1.20 cm Ø; A = 1.13 cm²
1.13 (100)
Sp = = 54.58 cm Provide 12 mm Sp. 54 cm
Say 48 cm.
2.07
3) Shrinkage & Temperature reinforcement
AST= 0.002x 100x 24= 4.80 cm²
Spacing of Reinforcement; Used 1.00 cm Ø; A = 0.78 cm²
0.78 (100)
Sp = = 16.25 cmProvide 10 mm Sp. 16
4.80
Check for shear:
S= V/bd
a) Top slab
S = 3673 / (100) (14) = 2.62 kg/cm²
b) Sidewalls
S = 2786 / (100) (16) = 1.74 kg/cm²
c) Bottom slab
S = 3647/ (100) (16) = 2.28 kg/cm²
Due to External Loading Due to Bursting
12mm
@ 12m 12mm @ 16cm
12mm @ 12cm 12mm
@ 18cm
12mm
@ 48cm
12mm
@ 24cm 12mm @ 24cm
12mm 12mm @ 12cm
@ 12cm
AND
GODBLESS
12mm @ 11cm
12mm @ 12cm
12mm
@ 12cm
12mm @ 12cm
12mm
@ 12cm