0% found this document useful (0 votes)
628 views14 pages

Classical Theory of International Trade Gipe 2

˜ Adam Smith attacked the mercantilist assumption that trade is a zero-sum game and promoted free trade. ˜ He argued that countries have an absolute advantage in producing certain goods more efficiently and should specialize in those goods, then trade to gain from exchange. ˜ David Ricardo further developed the theory to show that international trade benefits all nations even if one country is more efficient in all products, by focusing on the principle of comparative advantage where nations specialize in goods they have a lower comparative cost for.

Uploaded by

Sajal Singh
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
628 views14 pages

Classical Theory of International Trade Gipe 2

˜ Adam Smith attacked the mercantilist assumption that trade is a zero-sum game and promoted free trade. ˜ He argued that countries have an absolute advantage in producing certain goods more efficiently and should specialize in those goods, then trade to gain from exchange. ˜ David Ricardo further developed the theory to show that international trade benefits all nations even if one country is more efficient in all products, by focusing on the principle of comparative advantage where nations specialize in goods they have a lower comparative cost for.

Uploaded by

Sajal Singh
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

m m m

m mm

m m mm m mm

m

m
m
CLASSICAL THEORY
Answers three aspects:
˜ Gains from trade ± benefits and their division among
trading countries
˜ Structure of trade ± actual imports, exports and allocation
of resources and flow of trade
˜ Terms of trade ± rate at which imports and exports are
traded
m m m

m mm
In his Wealth of the Nations (1776), Adam Smith
promoted free trade by comparing nations to
households,
³w






w






m m m

m mm
˜Adam Smith attacked the mercantilist assumption
that trade is a zero-sum game (one country gains at
the cost of other one losing)
˜Countries differ in their ability to produce goods
efficiently, and that a country has an !
!!! in the production of a product when it is
more efficient than any other country in producing it
˜Countries should specialize in the production of
goods for which they have an absolute advantage and
then trade these goods for the goods produced by
other countries
m
m mm
˜ A country has an ! !!! over another in
the production of good X when an equal quantity of
resources can produce more X in the first country than
in the second = higher productivity!
!!!!
"m "
#! $% ! &' !
( &' ! &% !
!
Country A will produce and export wine.
Country B will produce and export cloth.
m
m mm
!!!)!!, each country divides its own
production capacity between wine and cloth
Total wine production 35 bareels (25+10)
Total cloth production 25 bales(10+15)
m !!!)!!,
˜ With 2 units of labour, A produces 50 barrels of wine
and B 30 bales of cloth
˜ Excess 15 bareels of wine and 5 bales of cloth with
same 2 units of labour put forth by each country
!!*!(!( !!
* !
mm
m mm
˜ Clear-cut absolute cost advantage or one country has an
absolute advantage in the production of all goods as a
special and not a general case for trade as unexplained
by Adam Smith
˜ A country to specialize in the production of those goods
that it produces most efficiently and to buy the goods
that it produces less efficiently from other countries
˜ " ( !!!) ! ( ! (
! (!( ! ! !!" * !+++
! ! (! ! !!! ! ! !
mm
m mm
˜ A difference in comparative costs of production ± the necessary
condition for international exchange to occur ± does, in fact,
reflect a difference in the techniques of production, the capital
and labor inputs, and productivity.
˜ The theory also aims at showing that trade is beneficial to all
participating countries: win/win!
˜ Positive-sum game of international trade!
˜ The gains from specialisation and trade depend on the pattern
of * !!!, not absolute advantage.
˜ With no trade, each countryµs consumption is limited by its
ability to produce.
˜ With free trade, each country specializes in producing only one
good.. Each country can reach its desirable levels of
consumption by trading.
m - mm
m mm
‰ ðixed endowment of resources, and homogenous factors
‰ ðactors of production completely mobile between alternative
uses within a country with identical factor prices and
completely immobile externally with factor prices be
different across countries prior to trade
‰ A labor theory of value is employed for the model.
‰ Costs of production are constant horizontal supply curve.
‰ ðull employment and perfect competition.
‰ No government-imposed obstacles to economic activity
(free trade)
‰ Internal and external transportation costs zero.
‰ Two-country and two-commodity trade
‰ Static model
# ./ #
.

" #! (! *!


*!

! 0'( 1'( 0'1'


! "! &#2'+01
& 2&+&3
! &$'( &''( &$'&''
! "! &#2&+$
& 2'+03#
* !!! 0'&$' 1'&''
!! '+45 '+1'
m
6m m
m- m
˜ In the example England has absolute
disadvantage in both productions while
Portugal has absolute advantage
˜ However comparative disadvantage of England
is less in case of cloth and comparative
advantage is more for Portugal in case of
production of wine
˜ Accordingly England will produce and export
cloth and Portugal would produce and export
wine
!#p$% !& '%(

p

p






p


!"
p
mmm mm
˜ International rate of exchange would be
1W=1C
˜ Therefore gains of England would be 1.20 -
1.00 = 0.20 while that of Portugal would be
1.00 - 0.89 = 0.11
˜ The total gains from trade with comparative
costs advantage would be 0.31(0.20+0.11)
˜ The two selling limits would be 0.89 and 1.20
for both. The terms of trade will fall within
these limits
˜ ( ! !! * !+

˜ Lacks positive approach and explains normative approach(welfare
model and not trade model)
˜ Unrealistic assumptions
˜ No explanation for differences in labour productivity between
countries
˜ Restrictive in nature
˜ Does not suit a trade between big and small sized countries
˜ Lack of universal application on defense and self-sufficiency
basis
˜ One sided and ignores demand factor
˜ Leaves protection policies out of application of theory
˜ Not applicable to undeveloped economies
- (!, 7! ! *" ! ! !!"! !
* !!! ! ! !! ! " ! !
" !!!! !+8

You might also like