The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100603062127/http://www.keepirelandopen.org:80/aims.htm










In Ireland you have no legal right to step onto private land, no matter how remote. In Ireland there is no such thing as a right of way apart from the obvious, for example public roads and urban parks.

Surprised? Well, so are visitors to Ireland who are accustomed in their own countries to wander where they wish over suitable terrain and who have clearly signed rights of way. (There�s more about this under the heading �The Background to Access and the Law� below).

The Aims of Keep Ireland Open are:

- To achieve a network of well-marked, maintained rights-of-way in lowland areas to allow short walks and to reach open ground;

- To gain freedom to roam over rough grazing land, that is about 7 percent of the total land area;

- To minimise barbed-wire fencing in mountain areas, as it is visually intrusive and severely hinders walkers.

Is there really a practical problem?

You may say that we do not need legal rights as long as we can actually get into the countryside and use what may be private paths and tracks. Fair enough, but the sad facts are that we are rapidly losing even the informal rights we had to access our own countryside. This is not obvious in the Wicklow area or in the East of the country generally. Ironically these are the very areas where there are most walkers and landowners may have legitimate cause to complain.

Most of the intractable problems are in the West, the area that attracts fewest walkers, and is an otherwise prime area for developing hill walking and other outdoor recreations as tourist attractions.

Here are a few of the many current access problems:

- Day trippers and casual walkers can no longer walk the Old Head of Kinsale, a traditional �lung� for so many people from Cork and around;

- Hill walkers can no longer visit parts of ranges such as the Benbulbin area in Sligo, the Twelve Bens in Connemara, or parts of the Dingle and Beara peninsulas in Kerry;

- Archaelogists can no longer visit the important megalithic tombs, for example at Carnbane in Westmeath;

- Bird watchers are increasingly cautious about walking through areas where they wish to study birds;

- Even beaches are not safe: Ugool beach near Westport, a public amenity for decades and supposedly in State hands, has been blocked off for years by a local landowner.

Surely there are areas where we have rights as walkers?

Yes, there are two main areas, but neither is in private ownership. They are:

- In National Parks (which are a miserable 1 percent of the land area);

- In State forests.

There are also the long distance paths, which are in total 3,000km long (England and Wales have 225,000km). However even these have been blocked by local landowners. In addition, they do not cater for shorter, looped walks or accessing wild open ground. In many instances they run through monotonous State-owned coniferous forest and on public roads simply because they have no alternative route across private land.

What about landowners� insurance problems?

The Occupiers� Liability Act 1995, which landowners enthusiastically promoted, means that a landowner would have to show �reckless disregard� for the safety of recreational users (or indeed trespassers) before s/he could be successfully brought to Court. As far as we know there was no case before the 1995 Act was brought into force. Certainly no walker has brought a landowner to Court after the 1995 Act.

Yet landowners come up with the same �insurance problem� time out of number. We can only conclude that they don�t really want to know the facts.

The Background to Access and the Law

There are two terms which we had better explain before we go further. These are:

- Freedom to Roam, which is the legal right to walk where you want, and which is relevant mainly to open remote ground but certainly never around dwellings;

- Rights of Way, which is the legal right to walk along a path or track. It is particularly important in cultivated areas and for those who want short, usually circular walks or who want to reach open ground.

In Ireland we make no pretence of having Freedom to Roam anywhere. We have a pretence of having rights of way but what does this amount to in practice? Nothing much is the sorry answer.

Let�s take an example. You are walking along a path in the hills which you have walked for years and are accosted by an angry landowner. You assert that this is a right of way. He claims that this is his land and demands to know why you think you have any rights here. Is it marked on the map as a right of way? It is not. Is there a sign where you started indicating that you have a right of way? There is not. So what makes you think you have a right to walk here? Nothing! That�s the legal situation here in Ireland and if you think this is merely theoretical go back and have a look at the cases listed above, only a small sample of what we have on file.

In the countries of North-west Europe which we have studied, recreational users (walkers, ramblers, birders etc, etc) have legal rights to walk in their own country; in some countries this includes the right to walk anywhere, except for obvious places such as across growing crops.

In stark contrast, we in Ireland have virtually no rights to walk our own country. This is not just our opinion. The EU has stated that there should be a presumption to allow access to the countryside unless there are compelling reasons otherwise. They have picked out Ireland as one of only two countries in the EU where access to the country is particularly restricted. And this in one of the least populated States in the whole of the EU!

The Law needs to be changed

Current legislation on access to the countryside is simple and one sided; in effect landowners have the law completely on their side. They can turn recreational users away, for any reason or none. The result is that landowners are increasingly using this imbalance to keep recreational users off areas they have traditionally visited and/or to demand money for allowing access. We urgently need a radical change in the laws.

But wouldn�t all this cost a fortune?

Yes, it would, but only if we convince ourselves that it would. In other European countries freedom to roam does not generally attract grants to landowners unless there are compelling reasons eg constant vandalism. The situation on providing rights of way is certainly going to cost something but it should be a one-off expenditure. Maintenance of these rights of way should be comparatively minor, certainly compared to the numbers of tourists such facilities should attract and to the improvement in the general well-being of our own people.

We have only one example of the costs in maintaining access facilities. It relates to Denmark where �90,000 has been put aside per annum to solve all access problems.

So what are the authorities doing about this?

We are not only way behind all our neighbours; with ever-restricting access we are actually moving in the opposite direction. Strangely, no public authority in Ireland seems to care a fig about this growing problem: not the tourist authorities, the relevant Government Departments or local authorities, all are gripped by denial.

Of course, sooner or later some authority here will have to take action and unfortunately it seems that it will be later rather than sooner unless the EU intervenes.

And in the meantime?

In the meantime we need hardly emphasise the effect this is having and will continue to have on tourism, both local and foreign, since walkers are a most important component of our tourism industry. Foreign walkers will probably be disappointed by the fact that the only rights of way they can find are the long distance walks, which have limited appeal. If they assume that because they have considerable rights to walk where they will in their own countryside they have similar rights in Ireland, then they are in for an unpleasant surprise on their first bruising encounter with an outraged landowner. It�s something they will remember and recount to their friends back home.

There is also a serious health implication. Walking is an excellent exercise that can be enjoyed by all age groups. We are not suggesting that Irish people have nowhere to walk, but the option of walking a traffic-free path or track is steadily diminishing.

What are you going to do about this?

If you feel that the present situation is satisfactory, and we would be surprised if you do, then do nothing! If however you feel that you should do something about it then join us! Keep Ireland Open is the national body working for the right to access our countryside, mountains, seashore, lakes, rivers and other natural amenities. It is composed of individual members and of national bodies concerned with recreational and leisure activities.

How will we achieve our objectives?

As we have done in the past we will continue to lobby politicians and other opinion makers both at national and EU level. We will raise the profile of access problems in the national and local media, talk to tourism interests, collate access problems nation-wide, research the laws and access conditions in other European countries.

We publish a quarterly newsletter outlining how our campaign is progressing.

We need you!

We need members to show that there are people who care about access, and so that we will have a strong body of support when we talk to politicians. Above all, we need help to do all the work just mentioned. It is interesting, important and useful work. Join us!

If you would like to inform us of any problems in your area please email us at [email protected]

home | aims | issues | policies | role & tactics | newsletter | How to Join | letters | contact