Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2020 Jan;25(1):3-6.
doi: 10.1177/1359105319887791. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

King's College London's enquiry into Hans J Eysenck's 'Unsafe' publications must be properly completed

Affiliations
Editorial

King's College London's enquiry into Hans J Eysenck's 'Unsafe' publications must be properly completed

David F Marks et al. J Health Psychol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

This journal recently drew attention to an extensive body of highly questionable research published by Hans J. Eysenck in collaboration with Ronald Grossarth-Maticek. The subsequent enquiry by King's College London concluded that 26 publications were unsafe and warranted retraction. However, the enquiry reviewed only a subset of the 61 questionable publications initially submitted to them, only those Eysenck co-authored with Grossarth-Maticek. The enquiry excluded publications where Eysenck was the sole author. The King's College London enquiry must be properly completed. They have a pressing responsibility to re-convene and broaden their review to include all Eysenck's publications based on the same body of research - including an additional 27 publications recently uncovered. The unsatisfactory nature of the KCL review process makes the case for a National Research Integrity Ombudsperson even stronger.

Keywords: H J Eysenck; King’s College London; enquiry; fraud; personality; smoking; unsafe papers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources