Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 14.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01627-x. Online ahead of print.

A 12-year overview of fertility preservation practice in Nordic pediatric oncology centers

Affiliations

A 12-year overview of fertility preservation practice in Nordic pediatric oncology centers

Babak Asadi-Azarbaijani et al. J Cancer Surviv. .

Abstract

Purpose: Fertility preservation is the only option to safeguard fertility following gonadotoxic treatments. This study aimed to provide an updated status on fertility preservation for pediatric cancer patients in the Nordic countries.

Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 14 questions was sent to directors of 18 main pediatric oncology centers in the Nordic countries in 2010 and 2022. We received information regarding indications, guidelines, counseling, and available fertility preservation options.

Results: The response rates were 89% in 2010 and 72% in 2022. The results reveal an increase in clinical practice guidelines on fertility preservation for cancer patients, from 25% in 2010 to 70% in 2022. Counseling on fertility preservation options in 2022 was more specific and offered to most patients who fulfilled indications for fertility preservation (from 19 to 77%). Sperm cryopreservation continues to be the predominant fertility preservation method for pubertal boys in the Nordic countries. However, there has been a notable increase in the availability of testicular tissue preservation for prepubertal boys (0 to 62%). A similar increase in the offer of ovarian tissue preservation for prepubertal girls (0 to 92%) was observed among pediatric cancer patients.

Conclusions: The past decade has shown commendable advancements in fertility preservation for pediatric cancer patients in the Nordic countries.

Implications for cancer survivors: As fertility care evolves globally, continuous assessment of regional practices and challenges is imperative to enhance the quality of care and life for pediatric cancer survivors in the Nordic regions.

Keywords: Cancer; Children; Fertility; Fertility preservation; Oncology; Pediatric; Questionnaire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Knopman JM, et al. Surviving childhood and reproductive-age malignancy: effects on fertility and future parenthood. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(5):490–8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anazodo A, et al. The development of an international oncofertility competency framework: a model to increase oncofertility implementation. Oncologist. 2019;24(12):e1450–9. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bleyer A. Latest estimates of survival rates of the 24 most common cancers in adolescent and young adult Americans. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2011;1(1):37–42. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gatta G, et al. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007: results of EUROCARE-5–a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):35–47. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Santen HM, et al. Reproductive complications in childhood cancer survivors. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2020;67(6):1187–202. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources