Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions by IVUS Versus FFR-Guided Treatment Decision
- PMID: 38018840
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013308
Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions by IVUS Versus FFR-Guided Treatment Decision
Abstract
Background: There are limited data regarding the safety of deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention based on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings. The current study sought to compare the prognosis between deferred lesions based on IVUS and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided treatment decision.
Methods: This study is a post hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR randomized trial (Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Stenosis) that compared 2-year clinical outcomes between IVUS- and FFR-guided treatment decision on intermediate coronary artery lesions using predefined criteria. In both IVUS and FFR groups, vessels were classified into deferred or revascularized vessels, and patients were classified as those with or without deferred lesions. Vessel-oriented composite outcomes (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) in deferred vessels and patient-oriented composite outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, or any revascularization) in patients with deferred lesions were compared between the IVUS and FFR groups.
Results: A total of 1682 patients and 1820 vessels were analyzed, of which 922 patients and 989 vessels were deferred. At 2 years, there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of vessel-oriented composite outcomes in deferred vessels between IVUS (n=375) and FFR (n=614) groups (3.8% versus 4.1%; hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.47-1.75]; P=0.77). The risk of vessel-oriented composite outcomes was comparable between deferred and revascularized vessels following treatment decision by IVUS (3.8% versus 3.5%; hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.54-2.19]; P=0.81) and FFR (4.1% versus 3.6%; hazard ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.56-2.32]; P=0.72). In comparison of patient-oriented composite outcomes in patients with deferred lesions, there was no significant difference between the IVUS (n=357) and FFR (n=565) groups (6.2% versus 5.9%; hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.61-1.80]; P=0.86).
Conclusions: In patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis, deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention based on IVUS-guided treatment decision showed comparable risk of clinical events with FFR-guided treatment decision.
Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02673424.
Keywords: coronary artery disease; coronary vessels; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; prognosis.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Deferring PCI Based on IVUS Assessment: On Par With FFR or FLAVOUR of the Week?Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Dec;16(12):e013649. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013649. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023. PMID: 38018839 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350036. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50036. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38170524 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May;17(5):e013844. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013844. Epub 2024 May 21. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024. PMID: 38771911 Clinical Trial.
-
Three-Year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May;17(5):e013191. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013191. Epub 2024 Apr 25. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024. PMID: 38660794 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Differential Prognostic Value of Revascularization for Coronary Stenosis With Intermediate FFR by Coronary Flow Reserve.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May 23;15(10):1033-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.01.297. Epub 2022 Apr 27. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022. PMID: 35490124
-
Should fraction flow reserve be considered an important decision-making tool to stratify patients with stable coronary artery disease for percutaneous coronary intervention?: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(46):e8748. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008748. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29145326 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Discordance Between Angiographic Assessment and Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound in Intermediate Coronary Lesions: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FLAVOUR Trial.Korean Circ J. 2024 Aug;54(8):485-496. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0046. Epub 2024 Jun 10. Korean Circ J. 2024. PMID: 38956940 Free PMC article.
-
Shining light on neurovascular disease.Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 26:15910199241285962. doi: 10.1177/15910199241285962. Online ahead of print. Interv Neuroradiol. 2024. PMID: 39324217 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical