Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug 21;8(8):CD003416.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub5.

Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection

Mohan S Kamath  1 , Mariano Mascarenhas  2 , Richard Kirubakaran  3 , Siladitya Bhattacharya  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection

Mohan S Kamath et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Transfer of more than one embryo during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) increases multiple pregnancy rates resulting in an increased risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Elective single embryo transfer offers a means of minimising this risk, but this potential gain needs to be balanced against the possibility of jeopardising the overall live birth rate (LBR).

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different policies for the number of embryos transferred in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group specialised register of controlled trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to March 2020. We handsearched reference lists of articles and relevant conference proceedings. We also communicated with experts in the field regarding any additional studies.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different policies for the number of embryos transferred following IVF or ICSI in infertile women. Studies of fresh or frozen and thawed transfer of one to four embryos at cleavage or blastocyst stage were eligible.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias. The primary outcomes were LBR and multiple pregnancy rate. The secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. We analysed data using risk ratios (RR), Peto odds ratio (Peto OR) and a fixed effect model.

Main results: We included 17 RCTs in the review (2505 women). The main limitation was inadequate reporting of study methods and moderate to high risk of performance bias due to lack of blinding. A majority of the studies had low numbers of participants. None of the trials compared repeated single embryo transfer (SET) with multiple embryo transfer. Reported results of multiple embryo transfer below refer to double embryo transfer. Repeated single embryo transfer versus multiple embryo transfer in a single cycle Repeated SET was compared with double embryo transfer (DET) in four studies of cleavage-stage transfer. In these studies the SET group received either two cycles of fresh SET (one study) or one cycle of fresh SET followed by one frozen SET (three studies). The cumulative live birth rate after repeated SET may be little or no different from the rate after one cycle of DET (RR 0.95, 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.82 to 1.10; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 985 participants; low-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 42% chance of live birth following a single cycle of DET, the repeated SET would yield pregnancy rates between 34% and 46%. The multiple pregnancy rate associated with repeated SET is probably reduced compared to a single cycle of DET (Peto OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.21; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 985 participants; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 13% risk of multiple pregnancy following a single cycle of DET, the risk following repeated SET would be between 0% and 3%. The clinical pregnancy rate (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.12; I² = 47%; 3 studies, 943 participants; low-quality evidence) after repeated SET may be little or no different from the rate after one cycle of DET. There may be little or no difference in the miscarriage rate between the two groups. Single versus multiple embryo transfer in a single cycle A single cycle of SET was compared with a single cycle of DET in 13 studies, 11 comparing cleavage-stage transfers and three comparing blastocyst-stage transfers.One study reported both cleavage and blastocyst stage transfers. Low-quality evidence suggests that the live birth rate per woman may be reduced in women who have SET in comparison with those who have DET (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.75; I² = 0%; 12 studies, 1904 participants; low-quality evidence). Thus, for a woman with a 46% chance of live birth following a single cycle of DET, the chance following a single cycle of SET would be between 27% and 35%. The multiple pregnancy rate per woman is probably lower in those who have SET than those who have DET (Peto OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.22; I² = 0%; 13 studies, 1952 participants; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 15% risk of multiple pregnancy following a single cycle of DET, the risk following a single cycle of SET would be between 2% and 4%. Low-quality evidence suggests that the clinical pregnancy rate may be lower in women who have SET than in those who have DET (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.77; I² = 0%; 10 studies, 1860 participants; low-quality evidence). There may be little or no difference in the miscarriage rate between the two groups.

Authors' conclusions: Although DET achieves higher live birth and clinical pregnancy rates per fresh cycle, the evidence suggests that the difference in effectiveness may be substantially offset when elective SET is followed by a further transfer of a single embryo in fresh or frozen cycle, while simultaneously reducing multiple pregnancies, at least among women with a good prognosis. The quality of evidence was low to moderate primarily due to inadequate reporting of study methods and absence of masking those delivering, as well as receiving the interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MSK, MM, RK and SB have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Repeated SET (mixed policies) versus multiple ET in a single cycle, outcome: 2.1 Cumulative live birth.
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Repeated SET (mixed policies) versus multiple ET in a single cycle, outcome: 2.2 Multiple pregnancy.
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Single versus multiple (in a single cycle), outcome: 2.1 Live birth.
7
7
Funnel plot of comparison: 3 Single versus multiple (in a single cycle), outcome: 3.1 Live birth.
8
8
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Single versus multiple (in a single cycle), outcome: 2.2 Multiple pregnancy.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2: Repeated SET (mixed policies) versus multiple ET in a single cycle, Outcome 1: Cumulative live birth
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2: Repeated SET (mixed policies) versus multiple ET in a single cycle, Outcome 2: Multiple pregnancy
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2: Repeated SET (mixed policies) versus multiple ET in a single cycle, Outcome 3: Clinical pregnancy rate
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2: Repeated SET (mixed policies) versus multiple ET in a single cycle, Outcome 4: Miscarriage
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3: Single versus multiple embryo transfer (in a single cycle), Outcome 1: Live birth
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3: Single versus multiple embryo transfer (in a single cycle), Outcome 2: Multiple pregnancy
3.3
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3: Single versus multiple embryo transfer (in a single cycle), Outcome 3: Clinical pregnancy rate
3.4
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3: Single versus multiple embryo transfer (in a single cycle), Outcome 4: Miscarriage
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4: Double embryo transfer versus more than two embryos transferred, Outcome 1: Live or cumulative live birth
4.2
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4: Double embryo transfer versus more than two embryos transferred, Outcome 2: Multiple pregnancy
4.3
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4: Double embryo transfer versus more than two embryos transferred, Outcome 3: Clinical pregnancy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Abuzeid 2017 {published data only}
    1. Abuzeid MI, Joseph S, Abuzeid Y, Salem W, Corrado MG, Ashraf M. The impact of single vs double blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcomes and the multiple birth rate: a prospective, randomized control trial. Fertility and Sterility 2014;100(Suppl 3):S90.
    1. Abuzeid OM, Deanna J, Abdelaziz A, Joseph SK, Abuzeid YM, Salem WH, et al. The impact of single vs double blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcomes and the multiple birth rate: a prospective, randomized control trial. Facts, Views & Vision: Issues in Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Health 2017;9(4):195-206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ISRCTN69937179. Comparison of pregnancy rates following transfer of one embryo versus two in patients under going fertility treatment [Comparing the results of one blastocyst transfer versus two in good prognosis patients going through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with intra cytoplasmic sperm injections (ICSI) and embryo transfer (ET): a prospective, randomized study]. controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN69937179 (first posted on 30 December 2011).
ASSETT 2003 {unpublished data only}
    1. ASSETT 2003 [pers comm]. Australian Study of Single Embryo Transfer (ASSET) clinical protocol. A multi-centre double blind randomised controlled trial to compare the outcomes of pregnancy following the transfer of either a single embryo (SET) or two embryos (DET) in an optimal group of patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) [ personal communication]. Email to Dr Michael Davies 28 July 2020.
Clua 2015 {published data only}
    1. Clua E, Tur R, Coroleu B, Rodríguez I, Boada M, Gómez MJ et al. Is it justified to transfer two embryos in oocyte donation? A pilot randomized clinical trial. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2015;31(2):154-61. - PubMed
    1. Clua E, Tur R, Coroleu B, Rodriguez I, Gomez MJ, Boada M, et al. Single embryo transfer vs. double embryo transfer in oocyte donation: A pilot randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 2014;29:i284.
    1. NCT01228474. Single embryo transfer vs. double embryo transfer in an oocyte donation programme [A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing SET vs DET in an oocyte donation programme]. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01228474 (first posted on 25 October 2010).
ECOSSE 2006 {unpublished data only}
    1. ISRCTN86466058. Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of Selective Single Embryo transfer [Efficacy and cost effectiveness of selective single embryo transfer: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial]. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN86466058 (first posted on 16 January 2006).
Gardner 2004 {published data only}
    1. Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertility and Sterility 2004;81(3):551-5. - PubMed
Gerris 1999 {published data only}
    1. Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Vande Meerssche M, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction 1999;14(10):2581-7. - PubMed
Heijnen 2006 {published data only}
    1. Heijnen EMEW, Klinkert ER, Schmoutziguer APE, Eijkemans MJC, te Velde ER, Broekmans FJM. Prevention of multiple pregnancies after IVF in women 38 and older: a randomized study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2006;13(3):386-93. - PubMed
Komori 2004 {published data only}
    1. Komori S, Kasumi H, Horiuchi I, Hamada Y, Suzuki C, Shigeta M, et al. Prevention of multiple pregnancies by restricting the number of transferred embryos: randomized control study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2004 Sep;270(2):91-3. - PubMed
López‐Regalado 2014b {published data only}
    1. López-Regalado ML, Clavero A, Gonzalvo MC, Serrano M, Martínez L, Mozas J, et al. Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2014;178:192-8. - PubMed
Lukassen 2005 {published data only}
    1. Lukassen HGM, Braat DDM, Wetzels AMM, Zeilhuis GA, Adang EMM, Scheenjes E, et al. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2005;20(3):702-8. - PubMed
Martikainen 2001 {published data only}
    1. Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Tomas C, Tapanainen J, Orava M, Tuomivaara L, et al. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Human Reproduction 2001;16(9):1900-3. - PubMed
Mostajeran 2006 {published data only}
    1. Mostajeran F, Haftbaradaran E. Pregnancy and multiple births rate after transferring 2 or 3 embryos. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2006;11(2):113-5.
Prados 2015 {published data only}
    1. NCT00814398. Single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer [Single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer in day 3 or blastocyst stage]. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00814398 (first posted on 23 December 2008).
    1. Prados N, Quiroga R, Caligara C, Ruiz M, Blasco V, Pellicer A, et al. Elective single versus double embryo transfer: live birth outcome and patient acceptance in a prospective randomised trial. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 2015;27(5):794-800. - PubMed
Thurin 2004 {published data only}
    1. Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;351(23):2392-402. - PubMed
    1. Thurin-Kjellberg A, Olivius C, Bergh C. Cumulative live-birth rates in a trial of single embryo or double embryo transfer. New England Journal of Medicine 2009;361(18):1812-3. - PubMed
Thurin 2005 {unpublished data only}
    1. Thurin A. Elective single embryo transfer [Doctoral thesis]. Gothenburg (Sweden): University of Gothenburg, 2005.
van Montfoort 2006 {published data only}
    1. Fiddelers AA, Montfoort A, Dirksen CD et al. Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction 2006;21(8):2090-7. - PubMed
    1. Fiddlers AA, Montfoort APA, Dirksen CD et al. Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2006;21(8):2090-7. - PubMed
    1. Montfoort AP, Fiddelers AA, Janssen JM, Derhaag JG, Dirksen CD, Dunselman GAJ et al. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2006;21(2):338-3. - PubMed
Vauthier‐Brouzes 1994 {published data only}
    1. Vauthier-Brouzes D, Lefebvre G, Sylvie L, Gonzales J, Darbois Y. How many embryos should be transferred in in vitro fertilization? A prospective randomized study. Fertility and Sterility 1994;62(2):339-42. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Bensdorp 2015 {published data only}
    1. Bensdorp AJ, Tjon-Kon-Fat RI, Bossuyt PM, Koks CA, Oosterhuis GJ, Hoek A, et al. Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2015;350:g7771. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tjon-Kon-Fat R, Bensdorp AJ, Mol BWJ, Van Der Veen F, Van Wely M. The natural conception rate in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility scheduled for treatment with IVF-SET, IVF-MNC or IUI-COH (INeS trial). Human Reproduction 2014;29:i214-15. - PubMed
Bowman 2004 {published data only}
    1. Bowman M. Reducing the multiple pregnancy rate in ART. Chotmaihet Thangphaet [Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand] 2004;87(Suppl 3):S132-5. - PubMed
Brabers 2016 {published data only}
    1. Brabers AEM, Van Dijk L, Groenewegen PP, Van Peperstraten AM, De Jong JD. Does a strategy to promote shared decision-making reduce medical practice variation in the choice of either single or double embryo transfer after in vitro fertilisation? A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2016;6(5):e010894. - PMC - PubMed
Eijkemans 2006 {published data only}
    1. Eijkemans MJ, Heijnen EM, Klerk C, Habbema JD, Fauser BC. Comparison of different treatment strategies in IVF with cumulative live birth over a given period of time as the primary end-point: Methodological considerations on a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Human Reproduction 2006;21(2):344-51. - PubMed
Elgindy 2011 {published data only}
    1. Elgindy EA, Abou-Setta AM, Mostafa MI. Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in women with high oestradiol concentrations: randomized controlled trial. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2011;23(6):789-98. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Forman 2012 {published data only}
    1. Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility 2013;100(1):100-7.e1. - PubMed
    1. Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Treff NR, Scott RT. Blastocyst euploid selective transfer (BEST): An RCT of comprehensive chromosome screening single embryo transfer (CCS-SET) vs double embryo transfer (DET)-equivalent pregnancy rates, eliminates twins. Fertility and Sterility 2012;98(3 Suppl 1):S49.
    1. NCT01408433. Single embryo transfer of a euploid embryo versus double embryo transfer. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01408433 (First posted on 3 August 2011).
Forman 2013 {published data only}
    1. Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Singer SA, Benson MR, Scott Jr RT. Reducing the burden of ART care: single blastocyst transfer after comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) provides equivalent delivery rates, eliminates twins and lowers global health care costs. Fertility and Sterility 2013;100(Suppl 3):S43.
Forman 2014 {published data only}
    1. Forman EJ, Hong KH, Franasiak JM, Scott RT Jr. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;210(2):157.e1-6. - PubMed
Frattarelli 2003 {published data only}
    1. Frattarelli JL, Leondires MP, McKeeby JL, Miller BT, Segars JH. Blastocyst transfer decreases multiple pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility 2003;79(1):228-30. - PubMed
Gardner 1998 {published data only}
    1. Gardner D K, Schoolcraft W B, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction 1998;13(12):3434-40. - PubMed
Guerif 2011 {published data only}
    1. Guerif F, Frapsauce C, Chavez C, Cadoret V, Royere D. Treating women under 36 years old without top-quality embryos on day 2: A prospective study comparing double embryo transfer with single blastocyst transfer. Human Reproduction 2011;26(4):775-81. - PubMed
Harrild 2009 {published data only}
    1. Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies M, De Neubourg D, Dumoulin JCM, Gerris J, et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: Results from an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials. Molecular Human Reproduction 2009;24(Suppl 1):i77. - PubMed
Hatırnaz 2016 {published data only}
    1. Hatırnaz S, Hatırnaz E, Dahan MH, Tan SL, Ozer A, Kanat-Pektas M, et al. Is elective single-embryo transfer a viable treatment policy in in vitro maturation cycles? Fertility and Sterility 2016;106(7):1691-95. - PubMed
Heijnen 2007 {published data only}
    1. Heijnen EM, Eijkemans MJ, De Klerk C, Polinder S, Beckers NG, Klinkert ER et al. A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2007;369(9563):743-9. - PubMed
IRCT20141217020351N10 {published data only}
    1. IRCT20141217020351N10. The sequential embryo transfer compared to single embryo transfer in one cycle. who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=IRCT20141217020351N10 (first posted on 13 May 2018).
Lao 2017 {published data only}
    1. Lao MT, Jayaprakasan K, Michael E, Varghese A. Can transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo influence outcome during fresh and frozen IVF cycles. Human Reproduction 2017;32:i211-12. - PubMed
Levitas 2004 {published data only}
    1. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Hackmon-Ram R, Sonin Y, Har-Vardi I, Potashnik G. A prospective, randomized study comparing blastocyst versus 48-72 h embryo transfer in women failed to conceive three or more in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles. In: Abstracts from the 57th Annual Meeting of ASRM. 2001.
    1. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Har-Vardi I, Albotiano S, Sonin Y, Hackmon-Ram R et al. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2-3 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study. Fertility and Sterility 2004;81(3):567-71. - PubMed
    1. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hackmon-Ram R, Albotiano S, Sonin Y et al. Blastocyst stage versus 48-72h embryo transfer in women who failed to conceive on three or more IVF treatment cycles: a prospective, randomized study. In: ESHRE Conference. Bologna, 2000:O-021.
Livingstone 2001 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Bowman M. Reducing the multiple pregnancy rate in ART. Chotmaihet Thangphaet [Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand] 2004;87(Suppl 3):S132-5. - PubMed
    1. Livingstone M, Bowman M. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomised trial. Abstracts of the 17th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility 2001:218.
    1. Livingstone MS. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Master of Medicine Treatise, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney 2003.
López‐Regalado 2014a {published data only}
    1. López-Regalado ML, Clavero A, Gonzalvo MC, Serrano M, Martínez L, Mozas J, et al. Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: a retrospective. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2014;31(12):1621-27. - PMC - PubMed
Motta 1998 A & B {published data only}
    1. Motta LA, Alegretti JR, Pico M, Sousa JW, Baracat EC, Serafini P. Blastocyst vs. cleaving embryo transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertility and Sterility 1998;70 Suppl 1:17.
Moustafa 2008 {published data only}
    1. Moustafa MK, Sheded SA, Mousta MAEL. Elective single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer in assisted reproduction. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2008;17(1):82-7. - PubMed
NCT03758833 {published data only}
    1. NCT03758833. eSET or eDET associated to PGT in IVF. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03758833 (first posted on 29 November 2018).
Pantos 2004 {published data only}
    1. Pantos K, Makrakis E, Stavrou D, Karantzis P, Vaxevanoglou T, Tzigounis V. Comparison of embryo transfer on day 2, day 3, and day 6: a prospective randomized study. Fertility and Sterility 2004;81(2):454-5. - PubMed
Rodriguez 2016 {published data only}
    1. Rodriguez PJ, Santistevan A, Sekhon L, Lee JA, Hunter CK, Mukherjee T, et al. 1 + 1 > 2: A cost effectiveness analysis of single embryo transfer with PGS in two successive cycles vs a double embryo transfer with PGS in one. Fertility and Sterility 2016;106(3):e337.
Schoolcraft 2013 {published data only}
    1. Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Comprehensive chromosome screening of trophectoderm with vitrification facilitates elective single-embryo transfer for infertile women with advanced maternal age. Fertility and Sterility 2013;100(3):615-9. - PubMed
Staessen 1993 {published data only}
    1. Staessen C, Janssenswillen C, Van Den Abbeel E, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Avoidance of triplet pregnancies by elective transfer of two good quality embryos. Human Reproduction 1993;8(10):1650-3. - PubMed
Thurin 2009 {published data only}
    1. Thurin-Kjellberg A, Olivius C, Bergh C. Cumulative live birth rates after single and double embryo transfer: Follow-up from the Scandinavian randomized controlled trial. Molecular Human Reproduction 2009;24:i76-7.
    1. Thurin-Kjellberg A, Olivius C, Bergh C. Cumulative live-birth rates in a trial of single embryo or double embryo transfer. New England Journal of Medicine 2009;361(18):1812-3. - PubMed
van Loendersloot 2017 {published data only}
    1. Loendersloot LL, Moolenaar LM, Wely M, Repping S, Bossuyt PM, Hompes PGA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of single versus double embryo transfer in IVF in relation to female age. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2017;214:25-30. - PubMed
van Montfoort 2005 {published data only}
    1. Montfoort APA, Dumoulin JCM, Land JA, Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Evers JLH. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. Human Reproduction 2005;20(2):433-6. - PubMed
Yang 2016 {published data only}
    1. Yang Z Lin J Zhang S Kuang Y Liu J. Selection of single blastocysts for transfer via time-lapse monitoring alone and with next-generation sequencing to reduce multiple pregnancies: A randomized pilot study. 2016 Fertility and Sterility;106(3):e156.
Zhang 2015 {published data only}
    1. Zhang J, Feret M, Luk J, Repping S, Bodri D, Chang L, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing Minimal Stimulation IVF with single embryo transfer to conventional IVF with double embryo transfer. Human Reproduction 2014;29:i329-30.
    1. Zhang J, Feret M, Yang M, Bodri D, Chavez-Badiola A, Repping S, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing two cycles of minimal stimulation IVF with single embryo transfer to one cycle of conventional IVF with double embryo transfer. Human Reproduction 2015;30:i96.

Additional references

ASRM 2012
    1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single embryo transfer. Fertility and Sterility 2012;97:835-42. - PubMed
ASRM 2017
    1. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 2017;107(4):901-03. - PubMed
Australia New Zealand ART data 2017
    1. Australia New Zealand ART data 2017. npesu.unsw.edu.au/data-collection/australian-new-zealand-assisted-reprod....
Berkowits 1996
    1. Berkowits RL, Lynch L, Stone J, Alvarez M. The current status of multifetal pregnancy reduction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;174(4):1265-72. - PubMed
Chambers 2007
    1. Chambers GM, Chapman MG, Grayson N, Shanahan M, Sullivan EA. Babies born after ART treatment cost more than non ART babies. A cost analysis of inpatient birth admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies. Human Reproduction 2007;22(12):3108-15. - PubMed
De Geyter 2018
    1. De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, et al, European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Human Reproduction 2018;33(9):1586-1601. - PubMed
Doyle 1996
    1. Doyle P. The outcome of multiple pregnancy. Human Reproduction 1996;11 Suppl 1:110-20. - PubMed
ESHRE 2000
    1. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Human Reproduction 2000;15(7):1856-64. - PubMed
Fiddelers 2007
    1. Fiddelers AA, Severens JL, Dirksen CD, Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Evers JL. Economic evaluations of single versus double embryo transfer in IVF. Human Reproduction Update 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):5-13. - PubMed
FIVNAT 1995
    1. FIVNAT (French In Vitro National). Pregnancies and births resulting from in vitro fertilization: French National Registry, analysis of data 1986 to 1990. Fertility and Sterility 1995;64(4):746-56. - PubMed
Garel 1992
    1. Garel M, Blondel B. Assessment at 1 year of the psychological consequences of having triplets. Human Reproduction 1992;7(5):729-32. - PubMed
Garel 1997
    1. Garel M, Salobir C, Blondel B. Psychological consequences of having triplets: a four-year follow up study. Fertility and Sterility 1997;67(6):1162-5. - PubMed
Gelbaya 2010
    1. Gelbaya TA, Tsoumpou I, Nardo L. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility 2010;94(3):936-45. - PubMed
Gerris 2004
    1. Gerris J, De Sutter P, De Neubourg D et al. A real life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Human Reproduction 2004;19(4):917-23. - PubMed
Giorgetti 1995
    1. Giorgetti G, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach JL, Salzmann J. Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Human Reproduction 1995;10(9):2427-31. - PubMed
Glujovsky 2016
    1. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 6. Art. No: CD002118. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5] - DOI - PubMed
GRADEpro GDT [Computer program]
    1. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime) GRADE pro GDT. Version accessed 17 March 2020. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). Available at gradepro.org.
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/.
Khalaf 2008
    1. Khalaf Y, El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Kamal A, Bolton V, Braude P. Selective single blastocyst transfer reduces the multiple pregnancy rate and increases pregnancy rates: a pre- and postintervention study. BJOG 2008;115(3):385-90. - PMC - PubMed
Laverge 2001
    1. Laverge H, De Sutter P, Van der Elst J, Dhont M. A prospective, randomized study comparing day 2 and day 3 embryo transfer in human IVF. Human Reproduction 2001;16(3):47680. - PubMed
Ledger 2006
    1. Ledger WL, Anumba D, Marlow N, Thomas CM, Wilson ECF, the Cost of Multiple Births Study group (COMBS group). The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK. BJOG 2006;113(1):21-5. - PubMed
Licciardi 2001
    1. Licciardi F, Berkeley AS, Krey L, Grifo J, Noyes N. A two-versus three-embryo transfer: the oocyte donation model. Fertility and Sterility 2001;75(3):510-3. - PubMed
Lieberman 1998
    1. Lieberman B. An embryo too many? Human Reproduction 1998;13:2664-6. - PubMed
Ludwig 2000
    1. Ludwig M, Schopper B, Katalinic A, Sturm R, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K. Experience with the elective transfer of two embryos under the conditions of the German embryo protection law: results of a retrospective data analysis of 2573 transfer cycles. Human Reproduction 2000;15(2):319-24. - PubMed
Maheshwari 2016
    1. Maheshwari A, Raja EA, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after either fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer: an analysis of 112,432 singleton pregnancies recorded in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority anonymized dataset. Fertility and Sterility 2016;106(7):1703-8. - PubMed
Maheshwari 2018
    1. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Human Reproduction Update 2018;24(1):35-58. - PubMed
Marek 1999
    1. Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK, Confer N, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertility and Sterility 1999;72(6):1035-40. - PubMed
Martin 1998
    1. Martin PM, Welch HG. Probabilities for singleton and multiple pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility 1998;70(3):478-81. - PubMed
McKinney 1996
    1. McKinney MK, Tuber SB, Downery JI. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: psychodynamic implications. Psychiatry 1996;59(4):393-407. - PubMed
McLernon 2010
    1. McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies MJ, Neubourg D, Dumoulin JCM et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ 2010;341:c6945. - PMC - PubMed
NICE 2013
    1. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156. Accessed 22 December 2019.
Papanikolaou 2006
    1. Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. New England Journal of Medicine 2006;354(11):1139-46. - PubMed
Preutthipan 1996
    1. Preutthipan S, Amso N, Curtis P, Shaw RW. The influence of number of embryos transferred on pregnancy outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Chotmaihet Thangphaet [Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand] 1996;79(10):613-7. - PubMed
Roberts 2011
    1. Roberts SA, McGowan L, Vail A, Brison DR. The use of single embryo transfer to reduce the incidence of twins: Implications and questions for practice from the 'towardSET?' project. Human Fertility 2011;14(2):89-96. - PubMed
Sebire 2000 [pers comm]
    1. Sebire NJ. Swedish in-vitro fertilisation study. Letter to: Editor of Lancet [journal] 4 March 2000; available at www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)72459-4/fulltext. - PubMed
Sullivan 2012
    1. Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J, et al. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Human Reproduction 2012;27(12):3609-15. - PubMed
Thurin 2006
    1. Kjellberg AT, Carlsson P, Bergh C. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Human Reproduction 2006;21(1):210-6. - PubMed
Tiitinen 2001
    1. Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Harkki P. Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. Human Reproduction 2001;16(6):1140-4. - PubMed
van Heesch 2010
    1. Heesch MMJ, Bonsel GJ, Dumoulin JCM, Evers LH, Hoeven MA, Severens JL, et al. Long term costs and effects of reducing the number of twin pregnancies in IVF by single embryo transfer: the TwinSing study. BMC Pediatrics 2010;10(1):75. - PMC - PubMed
van Heesch 2015
    1. Heesch MM, Evers JL, Hoeven MA, Dumoulin JC, Beijsterveldt CE, Bonsel GJ, et al. Hospital costs during the first 5 years of life for multiples compared with singletons born after IVF or ICSI. Human Reproduction 2015;30(6):1481-90. - PubMed
Vilska 1999
    1. Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Human Reproduction 1999;14(9):2392-5. - PubMed
Wadhawan 2009
    1. Wadhawan R, Oh W, Perritt RL, McDonald SA, Das A, Poole WK et al. Twin gestation and neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2009;123(2):e220-7. - PMC - PubMed
Wennerholm 2000
    1. Wennerholm UB, Bergh C, Hamberger L, Lundin K, Nilsson L, Wikland M. Incidence of congenital malformations in children born after ICSI. Human Reproduction 2000;15:944-8. - PubMed
Westergaard 2000
    1. Westergaard HB, Johansen AM, Erb K, Andersen AN. Danish National IVF Registry 1994 and 1995. Treatment, pregnancy outcome and complications during pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2000;79(5):384-9. - PubMed
Yaron 1997
    1. Yaron Y, Amit A, Kogosowski A, Peyser MR, David MP, Lessing JB. The optimal number of embryos to be transferred in shared oocyte donation: walking the thin line between low pregnancy rates and multiple pregnancies. Human Reproduction 1997;12(4):699-702. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Pandian 2001
    1. Ozturk O, Bhattacharya S, Serour G, Templeton A. Number of embryos for transfer following in‐vitro fertilisation or intra‐cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 4. Art. No: CD003416. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416] - DOI - PubMed
Pandian 2004
    1. Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Ozturk O, Serour G, Templeton A. Number of embryos for transfer following in‐vitro fertilisation or intra‐cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 10. Art. No: CD003416. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Pandian 2009
    1. Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Ozturk O, Serour G, Templeton A. Number of embryos for transfer following in‐vitro fertilisation or intra‐cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. Art. No: CD003416. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Pandian 2013
    1. Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Ozturk O, Serour G, Bhattacharya S, . Number of embryos for transfer following in‐vitro fertilisation or intra‐cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 7. Art. No: CD003416. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources