Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 18:6:21720.
doi: 10.1038/srep21720.

Impacts of different climate change regimes and extreme climatic events on an alpine meadow community

Affiliations

Impacts of different climate change regimes and extreme climatic events on an alpine meadow community

Juha M Alatalo et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Climate variability is expected to increase in future but there exist very few experimental studies that apply different warming regimes on plant communities over several years. We studied an alpine meadow community under three warming regimes over three years. Treatments consisted of (a) a constant level of warming with open-top chambers (ca. 1.9 °C above ambient), (b) yearly stepwise increases in warming (increases of ca. 1.0, 1.9 and 3.5 °C), and (c) pulse warming, a single first-year pulse event of warming (increase of ca. 3.5 °C). Pulse warming and stepwise warming was hypothesised to cause distinct first-year and third-year effects, respectively. We found support for both hypotheses; however, the responses varied among measurement levels (whole community, canopy, bottom layer, and plant functional groups), treatments, and time. Our study revealed complex responses of the alpine plant community to the different experimentally imposed climate warming regimes. Plant cover, height and biomass frequently responded distinctly to the constant level of warming, the stepwise increase in warming and the extreme pulse-warming event. Notably, we found that stepwise warming had an accumulating effect on biomass, the responses to the different warming regimes varied among functional groups, and the short-term perturbations had negative effect on species richness and diversity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Boxplots of responses for the canopy layer and bottom layer in the alpine meadow.
(A) Cover (%) in the canopy layer, (B) cover (%) in the bottom layer, (C) number of species in the canopy layer, (D) number of species in the bottom layer, (E) Simpsons diversity index (Simpson’s D) in the canopy layer, (F) Simpsons D in the bottom layer, (G) biomass (g/m2) in the canopy layer, and (H) biomass (g/m2) in the bottom layer. Treatments: control (Control), constant warming enhancement using open-top chambers (OTC), a stepwise increase in the magnitude of warming (Press) and a single-summer high-impact warming event (Pulse). Boxplots show the 10th to 90th percentiles of the data; n = 4 plots per treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Boxplots of responses for mean height (cm) of the canopy layer in the alpine meadow.
Treatments: control (Control), constant warming enhancement using open-top chambers (OTC), a stepwise increase in the magnitude of warming (Press) and a single-summer high-impact warming event (Pulse). Boxplots show the 10th to 90th percentiles of the data; n = 4 plots per treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Boxplots of responses in relative change in cover in plant functional groups in the alpine meadow.
(A) Cushions, (B) deciduous shrubs, (C) evergreens, (D) forbs, and (E) graminoids. Treatments: control (Control), constant warming enhancement using open-top chambers (OTC), a stepwise increase in the magnitude of warming (Press) and a single-summer high-impact warming event (Pulse). Boxplots show the 10th to 90th percentiles of the data; n = 4 plots per treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Boxplots of responses in relative change in the number of species in plant functional groups in the alpine meadow.
(A) Cushions, (B) deciduous shrubs, (C) evergreens, (D) forbs, and (E) graminoids. Treatments: control (Control), constant warming enhancement using open-top chambers (OTC), a stepwise increase in the magnitude of warming (Press) and a single-summer high-impact warming event (Pulse). Boxplots show the 10th to 90th percentiles of the data; n = 4 plots per treatment.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Boxplots of responses in relative change in the biomass of plant functional groups in the alpine meadow.
(A) Cushions, (B) deciduous shrubs, (C) evergreens, (D) forbs, and (E) graminoids. Treatments: control (Control), constant warming enhancement using open-top chambers (OTC), a stepwise increase in the magnitude of warming (Press) and a single-summer high-impact warming event (Pulse). Boxplots show the 10th to 90th percentiles of the data; n = 4 plots per treatment.

References

    1. Groom Q. J. Some poleward movement of British native vascular plants is occurring, but the fingerprint of climate change is not evident. PeerJ 1, e77 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stuble K. L. et al. Ant-mediated seed dispersal in a warmed world. PeerJ 2, e286 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrew N. R. et al. Assessing insect responses to climate change: What are we testing for? Where should we be heading? PeerJ 1, e11 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Field C. B. et al. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
    1. Jentsch A. & Beierkuhnlein C. Research frontiers in climate change: Effects of extreme meteorological events on ecosystems. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 340, 621–628 (2008).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources