Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2014 Apr;82(4):1355-60.
doi: 10.1128/IAI.01530-13. Epub 2014 Jan 13.

Specialized science

Arturo Casadevall  1 , Ferric C Fang
Affiliations
Editorial

Specialized science

Arturo Casadevall et al. Infect Immun. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

As the body of scientific knowledge in a discipline increases, there is pressure for specialization. Fields spawn subfields that then become entities in themselves that promote further specialization. The process by which scientists join specialized groups has remarkable similarities to the guild system of the middle ages. The advantages of specialization of science include efficiency, the establishment of normative standards, and the potential for greater rigor in experimental research. However, specialization also carries risks of monopoly, monotony, and isolation. The current tendency to judge scientific work by the impact factor of the journal in which it is published may have roots in overspecialization, as scientists are less able to critically evaluate work outside their field than before. Scientists in particular define themselves through group identity and adopt practices that conform to the expectations and dynamics of such groups. As part of our continuing analysis of issues confronting contemporary science, we analyze the emergence and consequences of specialization in science, with a particular emphasis on microbiology, a field highly vulnerable to balkanization along microbial phylogenetic boundaries, and suggest that specialization carries significant costs. We propose measures to mitigate the detrimental effects of scientific specialism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Smith A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Methuen & Co., Ltd., London, United Kingdom
    1. Becker GS, Murphy KM. 1992. The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. Q. J. Econ. 107:1137–1160. 10.2307/2118383 - DOI
    1. Biron CA, Casadevall A. 2010. On immunologists and microbiologists: ground zero in the battle for interdisciplinary knowledge. mBio 1(5):e00260–10. 10.1128/mBio.00260-10 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kass EH, Hayes KM. 1988. A history of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10(Suppl 2):1–159. 10.1093/clinids/10.Special_Supplement_2.1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petersdorf RG. 1978. The doctors' dilemma. N. Engl. J. Med. 299:628–634. 10.1056/NEJM197809212991204 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources