Who's afraid of peer review?
- PMID: 24092725
- DOI: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60
Who's afraid of peer review?
Comment in
-
Science communication: Power of community.Science. 2013 Dec 6;342(6163):1168-9. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6163.1168-b. Science. 2013. PMID: 24311661 No abstract available.
-
Science communication: Quality at stake.Science. 2013 Dec 6;342(6163):1169. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6163.1169-a. Science. 2013. PMID: 24311662 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Science communication: Flawed citation indexing.Science. 2013 Dec 6;342(6163):1169. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6163.1169-b. Science. 2013. PMID: 24311663 No abstract available.
-
Publish and perish.J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Jun;147(6):385-7. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.04.002. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27233454 No abstract available.
-
Predatory Publishing: An Emerging Threat to the Medical Literature.Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):150-151. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001521. Acad Med. 2017. PMID: 28121685
Similar articles
-
Science communication: Power of community.Science. 2013 Dec 6;342(6163):1168-9. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6163.1168-b. Science. 2013. PMID: 24311661 No abstract available.
-
Science communication: Flawed citation indexing.Science. 2013 Dec 6;342(6163):1169. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6163.1169-b. Science. 2013. PMID: 24311663 No abstract available.
-
Science communication: Quality at stake.Science. 2013 Dec 6;342(6163):1169. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6163.1169-a. Science. 2013. PMID: 24311662 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Scientific Misconduct (Fraud) in Medical Writing.Orthopedics. 2018 Mar 1;41(2):e176-e183. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180123-06. Epub 2018 Jan 29. Orthopedics. 2018. PMID: 29377051 Review.
-
Suspended judgment. Is the scientific paper a fraud?Control Clin Trials. 1991 Apr;12(2):273-6. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(91)90024-g. Control Clin Trials. 1991. PMID: 1645639 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics.Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016 Sep;12(3):353-62. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9785-x. Epub 2016 Jun 24. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016. PMID: 27342770 No abstract available.
-
Structuring the debate about research ethics in the psychology and law field: an international perspective.Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Apr 21;27(3):397-411. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1742243. eCollection 2020. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020. PMID: 33071548 Free PMC article.
-
Present-day tools for assessing publishing integrity in biomedical science represent valuable work in progress.Clin Rheumatol. 2021 May;40(5):2111-2112. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05702-x. Epub 2021 Mar 25. Clin Rheumatol. 2021. PMID: 33768422 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015).PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0193148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193148. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29466467 Free PMC article.
-
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis.mBio. 2019 Jun 4;10(3):e00411-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00411-19. mBio. 2019. PMID: 31164459 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical