Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD008040.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008040.pub3.

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults

Affiliations
Review

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults

Sheena Derry et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 11, 2010 (Derry 2010). Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services and society. Many sufferers choose not to, or are unable to, seek professional help and rely on over-the-counter analgesics. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce nausea and vomiting, which are commonly associated with migraine.

Objectives: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of paracetamol (acetaminophen), alone or in combination with an antiemetic, compared with placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine in adults.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Oxford Pain Relief Database for studies through 4 October 2010 for the original review, and to 13 February 2013 for the update. Two clinical trials registers (ClinicalTrials.gov and gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com) were also searched on both occasions.

Selection criteria: We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies using self-administered paracetamol to treat a migraine headache episode, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Numbers of participants achieving each outcome were used to calculate relative risk and numbers needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared with placebo or other active treatment.

Main results: Searches for the update identified one additional study for inclusion. Eleven studies (2942 participants, 5109 attacks) compared paracetamol 1000 mg, alone or in combination with an antiemetic, with placebo or other active comparators, mainly sumatriptan 100 mg. For all efficacy outcomes paracetamol was superior to placebo, with NNTs of 12 (19% response with paracetamol, 10% with placebo), 5.0 (56% response with paracetamol, 36% with placebo) and 5.2 (39% response with paracetamol, 20% with placebo) for 2-hour pain-free and 2- and 1-hour headache relief, respectively, when medication was taken for moderate to severe pain.Paracetamol 1000 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg was not significantly different from oral sumatriptan 100 mg for 2-hour headache relief; there were no 2-hour pain-free data.Adverse event rates were similar between paracetamol and placebo, and between paracetamol plus metoclopramide and sumatriptan. No serious adverse events occurred with paracetamol alone, but more serious and/or severe adverse events occurred with sumatriptan than with the combination therapy (NNH 32).

Authors' conclusions: Paracetamol 1000 mg alone is statistically superior to placebo in the treatment of acute migraine, but the NNT of 12 for pain-free response at two hours is inferior to at of other commonly used analgesics. Given the low cost and wide availability of paracetamol, it may be a useful first choice drug for acute migraine in those with contraindications to, or who cannot tolerate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin. The addition of 10 mg metoclopramide gives short-term efficacy equivalent to oral sumatriptan 100 mg. Adverse events with paracetamol did not differ from placebo; serious and/or severe adverse events were slightly more common with sumatriptan than with paracetamol plus metoclopramide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RAM has consulted for various pharmaceutical companies and received lecture fees from pharmaceutical companies related to analgesics and other healthcare interventions. RAM and SD have received research support from charities, government and industry sources at various times. The Oxford Pain Research Trust, the NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme, and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Programme provided support for the original review. The Oxford Pain Research Trust provided support for the update. None had any input into the review at any stage.

Figures

1
1
Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
2
2
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Paracetamol 1000 mg versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Pain‐free at 2 hours.
3
3
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Paracetamol 1000 mg versus placebo, outcome: 1.3 Headache relief at 2 hours.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Paracetamol 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Pain‐free at 2 hours.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Paracetamol 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Headache relief at 1 hour.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Paracetamol 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Headache relief at 2 hours.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Paracetamol 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Any adverse event.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Paracetamol 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Use of rescue medication at 6 h.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Paracetamol 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 6 Relief of associated symptoms at 2 hours.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Paracetamol 1000 mg versus placebo, Outcome 7 Relief of functional disability at 2 hours.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Paracetamol 1000 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus sumatriptan 100 mg, Outcome 1 Headache relief at 2 hours.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Paracetamol 1000 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus sumatriptan 100 mg, Outcome 2 Any adverse event.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Paracetamol 1000 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus sumatriptan 100 mg, Outcome 3 Major adverse event.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Paracetamol 1000 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus sumatriptan 100 mg, Outcome 4 Use of rescue medication at 24 h.
2.5
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 Paracetamol 1000 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg versus sumatriptan 100 mg, Outcome 5 Relief of light/noise sensitivity at 2 hours.

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Dexter 1985 {published data only}
    1. Dexter SL, Graham AN, Johnston ES, Ratcliffe DM, Wilkinson MI, Rose AJ. Double‐blind controlled study of paramax in the acute treatment of common and classical migraine. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1985;39(10):388‐92. - PubMed
Dowson 2000 {published data only}
    1. Dowson A, Ball K, Haworth D. Comparison of a fixed combination of domperidone and paracetamol (Domperamol) with sumatriptan 50 mg in moderate to severe migraine: a randomised UK primary care study. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2000;16(3):190‐7. - PubMed
Freitag 2008 {published data only}
    1. Freitag F, Diamond M, Diamond S, Janssen I, Rodgers A, Skobieranda F. Efficacy and tolerability of coadministration of rizatriptan and acetaminophen vs rizatriptan or acetaminophen alone for acute migraine treatment. Headache 2008;48(6):921‐30. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.01053.x] - DOI - PubMed
GL/MIG/001/92 {unpublished data only}
    1. A double‐blind, general practice study to compare GR43175 with paracetamol and metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine (Original protocol). 1992. Available at: www.gsk‐clinicalstudyregister.com/.
GL/MIG/001A/92 {unpublished data only}
    1. A double‐blind, general practice study to compare GR43175 with paracetamol and metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine (Amended protocol). 1992. Available at: www.gsk‐clinicalstudyregister.com/.
Hoernecke 1993 {published data only}
    1. Hoernecke R, Doenicke A. Treatment of migraine attacks: combination of dihydroergotamine tartrate and paracetamol in comparison with individual drugs and placebo [Behandlung des Migraneanfalls: die Kombination Dihydroergotamintartrat und Paracetamol im Vergleich zu den Einzelsubstanzen und Placebo]. Medizinische Klinik (Munich) 1993;88(11):642‐8. - PubMed
Lipton 2000 {published data only}
    1. Lipton RB, Baggish JS, Stewart WF, Codispoti JR, Fu M. Efficacy and safety of acetaminophenin the treatment of migraine. Results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, population‐based study. Archives of Internal Medicine 2000;160(22):3486‐92. - PubMed
MacGregor 1993 {published data only}
    1. MacGregor EA, Wilkinson M, Bancroft K. Domperidone plus paracetamol in the treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 1993;13(2):124‐7. - PubMed
Norrelund 1989 {published data only}
    1. Nørrelund N, Christiansen LV, Plantener S. Tolfenamic acid versus paracetamol in migraine attacks. A double‐blind study in general practice [Tolfenamsyre versus paracetamol ved migraeneanfald. En dobbeltblind undersogelse i almen praksis]. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1989;151(38):2436‐8. - PubMed
Oztürk 2012 {published data only}
    1. Oztürk V, Ertaş M, Baykan B, Sirin H, Ozge A, The Mig‐Etol Study Group. Efficacy and safety of 400 and 800 mg etodolac vs. 1,000 mg paracetamol in acute treatment of migraine: a randomized, double‐blind, crossover, multicenter, phase III clinical trial. Pain Practice 2012:Epub ahead of print. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00572.x] - DOI - PubMed
Prior 2010 {published data only}
    1. Prior MJ, Codispoti JR, Fu M. A randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of acetaminophen for treatment of migraine headache. Headache 2010;50(5):819‐33. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01638.x] - DOI - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Diamond 1976 {published data only}
    1. Diamond S. Treatment of migraine with isometheptene, acetaminophen, and dichloralphenazone combination: a double‐blind, crossover trial. Headache 1976;15(4):282‐7. - PubMed
Diener 2005 {published data only}
    1. Diener HC, Pfaffenrath V, Pageler L, Peil H, Aicher B. The fixed combination of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol and caffeine is more effective than single substances and dual combination for the treatment of headache: a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, single‐dose, placebo‐controlled parallel group study. Cephalalgia 2005;25(10):776‐87. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.00948.x] - DOI - PubMed
Larsen 1990 {published data only}
    1. Larsen BH, Christiansen LV, Andersen B, Olesen J. Randomized double‐blind comparison of tolfenamic acid and paracetamol in migraine. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1990;81(5):464‐7. - PubMed

Additional references

Ad Hoc 1962
    1. Ad Hoc Committee on the Classification of Headache, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness. Classification of headache. JAMA 1962;179(9):717‐8.
Ayzenberg 2012
    1. Ayzenberg I, Katsarava Z, Sborowski A, Chernysh M, Osipova V, Tabeeva G, et al. The prevalence of primary headache disorders in Russia: a countrywide survey. Cephalalgia 2012;32(5):373‐81. [DOI: 10.1177/0333102412438977] - DOI - PubMed
Bigal 2008
    1. Bigal ME, Serrano D, Reed M, Lipton RB. Chronic migraine in the population: burden, diagnosis, and satisfaction with treatment. Neurology 2008;71(8):559‐66. [DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000323925.29520.e7] - DOI - PubMed
Bloudek 2012
    1. Bloudek LM, Stokes M, Buse DC, Wilcox TK, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, et al. Cost of healthcare for patients with migraine in five European countries: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Journal of Headache and Pain 2012;13(5):361‐78. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194-012-0460-7] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Botting 2000
    1. Botting RM. Mechanism of action of acetaminophen: is there a cyclooxygenase 3?. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2000;31(5):S203‐S210. - PubMed
Buse 2011
    1. Buse D, Manack A, Serrano D, Reed M, Varon S, Turkel C, et al. Headache impact of chronic and episodic migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study. Headache 2012;52(1):3‐17. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02046.x] - DOI - PubMed
Chandrasekharan 2002
    1. Chandrasekharan NV. COX‐3, a cyclooxygenase‐1 variant inhibited by acetaminophen and other analgesic/antipyretic drugs: cloning, structure and expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002;99(21):13926‐31. - PMC - PubMed
Collins 1997
    1. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?. Pain 1997;72(1‐2):95‐7. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00005-5] - DOI - PubMed
Cook 1995
    1. Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995;310(6977):452‐4. - PMC - PubMed
CSM 1997
    1. Committee on Safety of Medicines. Medicines Control Agency. Paracetamol and aspirin. Current Problems in Pharmacovigilance 1997;23:9.
Dart 2000
    1. Dart RC, Kuffner EK, Rumack BH. Treatment of pain or fever with paracetamol (acetaminophen) in the alcoholic patient: a systematic review. American Journal of Medicine 2000;7(2):123‐34. - PubMed
Derry 2012b
    1. Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Sumatriptan (oral route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008615.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Derry 2013
    1. Derry S, Rabbie R, Moore RA. Diclofenac with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008783.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Diamond 2007
    1. Diamond S, Bigal ME, Silberstein S, Loder E, Reed M, Lipton RB. Patterns of diagnosis and acute and preventive treatment for migraine in the United States: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study. Headache 2007;47(3):355‐63. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00631.x] - DOI - PubMed
Diener 1998
    1. Diener HC, Kaube H, Limmroth V. A practical guide to the management and prevention of migraine. Drugs 1998;56(5):811‐24. - PubMed
Elbourne 2002
    1. Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A. Meta‐analyses involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31(1):140‐9. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/31.1.140] - DOI - PubMed
Evers 2009
    1. Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, Goadsby PJ, Linde M, May A, et al. EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine ‐ revised report of an EFNS task force. European Journal of Neurology 2009;16(9):968‐81. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02748.x] - DOI - PubMed
Flower 1972
    1. Flower RJ, Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthetase in brain explains the anti‐pyretic activity of paracetamol (4‐acetamidophenol). Nature 1972;240(5381):410‐1. - PubMed
Friedman 2005
    1. Friedman BW, Corbo J, Lipton RB, Bijur PE, Esses D, Solorzano C, et al. A trial of metoclopramide vs sumatriptan for the emergency department treatment of migraines. Neurology 2005;64(3):463‐8. [DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000150904.28131.DD] - DOI - PubMed
Graham 2005
    1. Graham GG, Scott KF. Mechanism of action of paracetamol. American Journal of Therapeutics 2005;12(1):46‐55. [DOI: 10.1097/00045391-200501000-00008] - DOI - PubMed
Gunnell 1997
    1. Gunnell D, Hawton K, Garnier V, Bismuth C, Fagg J. Use of paracetamol for suicide and non‐fatal poisoning in the UK and France: are restrictions on availability justified?. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1997;51(2):175‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Hawkins 2007
    1. Hawkins LC, Edwards JN, Dargan PI. Impact of restricting paracetamol pack sizes on paracetamol poisoning in the United Kingdom: a review of the literature. Drug Safety 2007;30(6):465‐79. - PubMed
Hawton 2001
    1. Hawton K, Townsend E, Deeks J, Appleby L, Gunnell D, Bennewith O, et al. Effects of legislation restricting pack sizes of paracetamol and salicylate on self poisoning in the United Kingdom: before and after study. BMJ 2001;322(7296):1203‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Hazard 2009
    1. Hazard E, Munakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MF, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value in Health 2009;12(1):55‐64. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00404.x] - DOI - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hinz 2008
    1. Hinz B, Cheremina O, Brune K. Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is a selective cyclooxygenase‐2 inhibitor in man. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal 2008;22(2):383‐90. [DOI: 10.1096/fj.07-8506com] - DOI - PubMed
IHS 1988
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988;8 Suppl 7:1‐96. - PubMed
IHS 2000
    1. International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition. Cephalalgia 2000;20(9):765‐86. - PubMed
IHS 2004
    1. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004;24 Suppl 1:1‐160. - PubMed
Jadad 1996a
    1. Jadad AR, Carroll D, Moore A, McQuay H. Developing a database of published reports of randomised clinical trials in pain research. Pain 1996;66(2‐3):239‐46. - PubMed
Jadad 1996b
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17(1):1‐12. - PubMed
Kirthi 2013
    1. Kirthi V, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Aspirin with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008041.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
L'Abbé 1987
    1. L'Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O'Rourke K. Meta‐analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;107(2):224‐33. - PubMed
Leonardi 2005
    1. Leonardi M, Steiner TJ, Scher AT, Lipton RB. The global burden of migraine: measuring disability in headache disorders with WHO's Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Journal of Headache and Pain 2005;6(6):429‐40. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194-005-0252-4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Linde 2012
    1. Linde M, Gustavsson A, Stovner LJ, Steiner TJ, Barré J, Katsarava Z, et al. The cost of headache disorders in Europe: the Eurolight project. European Journal of Neurology 2012;19(5):703‐11. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03612.x] - DOI - PubMed
Lipton 1999
    1. Lipton RB, Stewart WF. Acute migraine therapy: do doctors understand what patients with migraine want from therapy?. Headache 1999;39 Suppl 2:S20‐S26.
Lipton 2007
    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, AMPP Advisory Group, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007;68(5):343‐9. - PubMed
Lucas 2006
    1. Lucas C, Géraud G, Valade D, Chautard MH, Lantéri‐Minet M. Recognition and therapeutic management of migraine in 2004, in France: results of FRAMIG 3, a French nationwide population‐based survey. Headache 2006;46(5):715‐25. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00430.x] - DOI - PubMed
Moore 1998
    1. Moore RA, Gavaghan D, Tramer MR, Collins SL, McQuay HJ. Size is everything ‐ large amounts of information are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effects. Pain 1998;78(3):209‐16. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00140-7] - DOI - PubMed
Moore 2008
    1. Moore RA, Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Managing potential publication bias. In: McQuay HJ, Kalso E, Moore RA editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Pain Research: Methodology Refined. Seattle: IASP Press, 2008:15‐24. [ISBN: 978‐0‐931092‐69‐5]
Morris 1995
    1. Morris JA, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for relative risk, odds ratios and standardised ratios and rates. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with confidence ‐ confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: British Medical Journal, 1995:50‐63. - PMC - PubMed
Munakata 2009
    1. Munakata J, Hazard E, Serrano D, Klingman D, Rupnow MF, Tierce J, et al. Economic burden of transformed migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache 2009;49(4):498‐508. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01369.x] - DOI - PubMed
Norris 2008
    1. Norris W, Paredes AH, Lewis JH. Drug‐induced liver injury in 2007. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 2008;24(3):287‐97. - PubMed
Oldman 2002
    1. Oldman AD, Smith LA, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Pharmacological treatments for acute migraine: quantitative systematic review. Pain 2002;97(3):247‐57. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00024-6] - DOI - PubMed
PIC 2009
    1. PharmWeb. Paracetamol Information Centre. www.pharmweb.net/pwmirror/pwy/paracetamol/pharmwebpic.html (accessed 30 July 2009).
Prescott 2000
    1. Prescott LF. Therapeutic misadventure with paracetamol: fact or fiction?. American Journal of Therapeutics 2000;7(2):99‐114. - PubMed
Rabbie 2013
    1. Rabbie R, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Ibuprofen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008039.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Radtke 2009
    1. Radtke A, Neuhauser H. Prevalence and burden of headache and migraine in Germany. Headache 2009;49(1):79‐89. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01263.x] - DOI - PubMed
RevMan 2012 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
Ross‐Lee 1983
    1. Ross‐Lee LM, Eadie MJ, Heazlewood V, Bochner F, Tyrer JH. Aspirin pharmacokinetics in migraine. The effect of metoclopramide. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1983;24(6):777‐85. - PubMed
Salazar‐Tortolero 2008
    1. Salazar‐Tortolero G, Huertas‐Campistol A, Vergez‐Pinto L, Ramos‐Brunet A, Lluch‐López J. Metoclopramide as a painkiller for intense migraine headache in emergency departments [Metoclopramida como analgésicoen la cefalea migrañosa intensa en urgencias]. Revista de Neurologia 2008;47(10):506‐8. - PubMed
Schwab 2003
    1. Schwab JM, Schluesener HJ, Laufer S. COX‐3: just another COX or the solitary elusive target of paracetamol?. Lancet 2003;361(9362):981‐2. - PubMed
Soyka 1988
    1. Soyka D. Diagnosis of migraine [Diagnostik der Migrane]. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 1988;113(18):735‐6. - PubMed
Steiner 2013
    1. Steiner TS, Stovner LJ, Birbeck GL. Migraine: the seventh disabler. Journal of Headache and Pain 2013;14:1. [DOI: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-1] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Stovner 2010
    1. Stovner LJ, Andree C. Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project. Journal of Headache and Pain 2010;11(4):289‐99. [DOI: 10.1007/s10194-010-0217-0] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Tramer 1997
    1. Tramèr MR, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate results on meta‐analysis: a case study. BMJ 1997;315(7109):635‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Victor 2010
    1. Victor TW, Hu X, Campbell JC, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Migraine prevalence by age and sex in the United States: a life‐span study. Cephalalgia 2010;30(9):1065‐72. - PubMed
Volans 1974
    1. Volans GN. Absorption of effervescent aspirin during migraine. British Medical Journal 1974;4(5939):265‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Volans 1975
    1. Volans GN. The effect of metoclopramide on the absorption of effervescent aspirin in migraine. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1975;2(1):57‐63. - PMC - PubMed
Vos 2012
    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990‐2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2163‐96. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Wenzel 2003
    1. Wenzel RG, Sarvis CA, Krause ML. Over‐the‐counter drugs for acute migraine attacks: literature review and recommendations. Pharmacotherapy 2003;23(4):494‐505. - PubMed
Yu 2012
    1. Yu S, Liu R, Zhao G, Yang X, Qiao X, Feng J, et al. The prevalence and burden of primary headaches in China: a population‐based door‐to‐door survey. Headache 2012;52(4):582‐91. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02061.x] - DOI - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Derry 2010
    1. Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008040.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms