Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;79(2 Pt 1):021910.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.021910. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

Deformation of biological cells in the acoustic field of an oscillating bubble

Affiliations

Deformation of biological cells in the acoustic field of an oscillating bubble

Pavel V Zinin et al. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

In this work we develop a theoretical framework of the interaction of microbubbles with bacteria in the ultrasound field using a shell model of the bacteria, following an approach developed previously [P. V. Zinin, Phys. Rev. E 72, 61907 (2005)]. Within the shell model, the motion of the cell in an ultrasonic field is determined by the motion of three components: the internal viscous fluid, a thin elastic shell, and the surrounding viscous fluid. Several conclusions can be drawn from the modeling of sound interaction with a biological cell: (a) the characteristics of a cell's oscillations in an ultrasonic field are determined both by the elastic properties of the shell the viscosities of all components of the system, (b) for dipole quadrupole oscillations the cell's shell deforms due to a change in the shell area this oscillation depends on the surface area modulus K{A} , (c) the relative change in the area has a maximum at frequency f{K} approximately 1/2pi square root[K{A}(rhoa;{3})] , where a is the cell's radius and rho is its density. It was predicted that deformation of the cell wall at the frequency f{K} is high enough to rupture small bacteria such as E . coli in which the quality factor of natural vibrations is less than 1 (Q<1). For bacteria with high value quality factors (Q>1) , the area deformation has a strong peak near a resonance frequency f{K} however, the value of the deformation near the resonance frequency is not high enough to produce sufficient mechanical effect. The theoretical framework developed in this work can be extended for describing the deformation of a biological cell under any arbitrary, external periodic force including radiation forces unduced by acoustical (acoustical levitation) or optical waves (optical tweezers).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Stresses on the element of the spherical shell in the spherical coordinates (r, θ, φ).
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
(Color online) Diagram of the interaction of a vibrating bubble with bacteria in ultrasound field. Following notations were introduced in the text and shown in the figure: xyz are Cartesian coordinates; θ is the zenith angle in the spherical coordinate system; a is the radius of the cell; Ro is the equilibrium radius of the bubble; L is the distance between center of the cell (O) and center of the bubble (Q); P is a point on the cell surface; R is the distance between center of the bubble and point P; ko is the wave vector of the incident plane sound wave; c and η are sound velocity and viscosity of the corresponding liquids.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
(Color online) Radius of a bubble at its linear resonance as a function of the frequency from Minnaert’s Eq. (67).
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
(Color online) Frequency dependence of the area deformation (n = 2) of the B. emersonii in the vicinity of an oscillating bubble calculated with the parameters from Table I.
FIG. 5
FIG. 5
(Color online) Frequency dependence of area deformation of the E. coli in the vicinity of oscillating bubble calculated for two radii of the cell with the parameters taken from Table I.
FIG. 6
FIG. 6
(Color online) Frequency dependence of the area deformation (n = 2) of the E. coli in the vicinity of oscillating bubble calculated for different internal and external viscosities.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ford LH. Phys. Rev. E. 2003;67:051924. - PubMed
    1. Talati M, Jha PK. Phys. Rev. E. 2006;73:011901. - PubMed
    1. Fonoberov VA, Balandin AA. Phys. Status Solidi B. 2004;241:R67.
    1. van Vlijmen HWT, Karplus M. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;350:528. - PubMed
    1. Tsen KT, et al. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007;12:024009. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources