Optimal running speed and the evolution of hominin hunting strategies
- PMID: 19297009
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.11.002
Optimal running speed and the evolution of hominin hunting strategies
Abstract
Recent discussion of the selective pressures leading to the evolution of modern human postcranial morphology, seen as early as Homo erectus, has focused on the relative importance of walking versus running. Specifically, these conversations have centered on which gait may have been used by early Homo to acquire prey. An element of the debate is the widespread belief that quadrupeds are constrained to run at optimally efficient speeds within each gait, whereas humans are equally efficient at all running speeds. The belief in the lack of optimal running speeds in humans is based, however, on a number of early studies with experimental designs inadequate for the purpose of evaluating optimality. Here we measured the energetic cost of human running (n=9) at six different speeds for five minutes at each speed, with careful replicates and controls. We then compared the fit of linear versus curvilinear models to the data within each subject. We found that individual humans do, in fact, have speeds at which running is significantly less costly than at other speeds (i.e., an optimal running speed). In addition, we demonstrate that the use of persistence hunting methods to gain access to prey at any running speed, even the optimum, would be extremely costly energetically, more so than a persistence hunt at optimal walking speed. We argue that neither extinct nor extant hominin populations are as flexible in the chosen speeds of persistence hunting pursuits as other researchers have suggested. Variations in the efficiency of human locomotion appear to be similar to those of terrestrial quadrupeds.
Similar articles
-
Optimal speeds for walking and running, and walking on a moving walkway.Chaos. 2009 Jun;19(2):026112. doi: 10.1063/1.3141428. Chaos. 2009. PMID: 19566272
-
Calcaneus length determines running economy: implications for endurance running performance in modern humans and Neandertals.J Hum Evol. 2011 Mar;60(3):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.11.002. Epub 2011 Jan 26. J Hum Evol. 2011. PMID: 21269660
-
The Laetoli footprints and early hominin locomotor kinematics.J Hum Evol. 2008 Jan;54(1):112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.07.005. Epub 2007 Sep 5. J Hum Evol. 2008. PMID: 17804036
-
Docosahexaenoic acid, the aquatic diet, and hominin encephalization: difficulties in establishing evolutionary links.Am J Hum Biol. 2007 Jan-Feb;19(1):132-41. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20579. Am J Hum Biol. 2007. PMID: 17160979 Review.
-
The structure of variability in human walking and running is speed-dependent.Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2008 Oct;36(4):200-4. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181877d71. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2008. PMID: 18815489 Review.
Cited by
-
Control of movement vigor and decision making during foraging.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):E10476-E10485. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812979115. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. PMID: 30322938 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in foot strike patterns during running among habitually barefoot populations.PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052548. Epub 2013 Jan 9. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23326341 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Is there any Proffitt in stair climbing? A headcount of studies testing for demographic differences in choice of stairs.Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):71-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0463-7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014. PMID: 23775216 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the energy costs of intermittent exercise.J Hum Kinet. 2013 Oct 8;38:107-13. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2013-0050. eCollection 2013. J Hum Kinet. 2013. PMID: 24235988 Free PMC article.
-
Extrapolating Metabolic Savings in Running: Implications for Performance Predictions.Front Physiol. 2019 Feb 11;10:79. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00079. eCollection 2019. Front Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30804807 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources