Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Nov 18;179(11):1143-51.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080808.

The cost-effectiveness of Vancouver's supervised injection facility

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The cost-effectiveness of Vancouver's supervised injection facility

Ahmed M Bayoumi et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: The cost-effectiveness of Canada's only supervised injection facility has not been rigorously evaluated. We estimated the impact of the facility on survival, rates of HIV and hepatitis C virus infection, referral to methadone maintenance treatment and associated costs.

Methods: We simulated the population of Vancouver, British Columbia, including injection drug users and persons infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus. The model used a time horizon of 10 years and the perspective of the health care system. We compared the situation of the supervised injection facility with one that had no facility but that had other interventions, such as needle-exchange programs. The effects considered were decreased needle sharing, increased use of safe injection practices and increased referral to methadone maintenance treatment. Outcomes included life-years gained, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios discounted at 5% per year.

Results: Focusing on the base assumption of decreased needle sharing as the only effect of the supervised injection facility, we found that the facility was associated with an incremental net savings of almost $14 million and 920 life-years gained over 10 years. When we also considered the health effect of increased use of safe injection practices, the incremental net savings increased to more than $20 million and the number of life-years gained to 1070. Further increases were estimated when we considered all 3 health benefits: the incremental net savings was more than $18 million and the number of life-years gained 1175. Results were sensitive to assumptions related to injection frequency, the risk of HIV transmission through needle sharing, the frequency of safe injection practices among users of the facility, the costs of HIV-related care and of operating the facility, and the proportion of users who inject in the facility.

Interpretation: Vancouver's supervised injection site is associated with improved health and cost savings, even with conservative estimates of efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1: Projected change in the prevalence of HIV (top) and hepatitis C virus (bottom) infection among injection drug users in Vancouver with and without the supervised injection facility.
None
Figure 2: Incremental cost-effectiveness of the supervised injection facility at different assumptions about the number of annual injections. The model shows cost savings and improved health benefits if the number of annual injections is between 490 and 1762. The base assumption is indicated by the dotted line.
None
Figure 3: Incremental cost-effectiveness of the supervised injection facility at different assumptions about the percentage of injection drug users who are regular users of the facility. The solid line indicates the cost-effectiveness when decreases in needle sharing are considered the only effect of the facility. The dashed line indicates the cost-effectiveness when all effects are considered (decreased needle sharing, safer injection practices [e.g., use of bleach to sterilize shared needles] and increased referral to methadone maintenance treatment). The base assumption was 21% (not shown).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Broadhead RS, Kerr TH, Grund JC, et al. Safer injection facilities in North America: their place in public policy and health initiatives. J Drug Iss 2002:329-56.
    1. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Supervised injection facilities (SIFs). Ottawa (ON): The Centre; 2005. Available: www.ccsa.ca/NR/rdonlyres/A0287BDC-BB0E-4B83-9E98-E55FF218DDC7/0/ccsa0106...
    1. Kerr T, Tyndall M, Li K, et al. Safer injection facility use and syringe sharing in injection drug users. Lancet 2005;366:316-8. - PubMed
    1. Stoltz JA, Wood E, Small W, et al. Changes in injecting practices associated with the use of a medically supervised safer injection facility. J Public Health (Oxf) 2007;29:35-9. - PubMed
    1. Wood E, Tyndall MW, Montaner JS, et al. Summary of findings from the evaluation of a pilot medically supervised safer injecting facility. CMAJ 2006;175:1399-404. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms