Abstract
In the context of digital transformation, higher education is facing increasing demands to innovate teaching methods in order to foster essential soft skills among students. Among these, critical thinking and digital adaptability are considered two core competencies that enable learners not only to actively acquire knowledge but also to flexibly adapt to digital learning and working environments. This article explores the role of philosophy - not merely as an academic discipline, but as a pedagogical tool with the potential to simultaneously enhance both critical thinking and digital adaptability. While philosophy encourages logical reasoning and deep reflection, digital adaptability requires flexibility and initiative in a technology-rich environment, revealing a complementary relationship that can be leveraged in higher education. However, a review of the literature indicates a lack of concrete pedagogical models that integrate critical thinking and digital adaptability in the teaching of philosophy. This gap raises the central research question: How can critical thinking and digital adaptability be integrated into philosophy instruction to contribute to the development of soft skills among students in the context of digital transformation in higher education? Grounded in theoretical analysis and philosophical reasoning, this paper proposes an integrative model consisting of three key components: critical thinking, digital adaptability, and innovative teaching methods. This is the study’s primary contribution, offering not only a novel pedagogical approach to philosophy instruction but also a foundation for future applied and empirical research aimed at enhancing soft skill development in digitalized higher education.

Data availability
All data used in this study are fully provided in the article. If there is any request for additional data, the author is willing to provide it upon reasonable request.
References
Bevir M (Ed) (2013) The sage handbook of governance, 1st edn. SAGE Publications
Bond M, Buntins K, Bedenlier S, Zawacki-Richter O, Kerres M (2020) Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. Int J Educ Technol Higher Educ 17(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Bond M, Marín VI, Dolch C, Bedenlier S (2018) Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. Int J Educ Technol Higher Educ 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
Broda E, Strömbäck J (2024) Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news: lessons from an interdisciplinary, systematic literature review. Ann Int Commun Assoc 48(2):139–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2024.2323736
Brookfield SD (2011) Teaching for critical thinking: tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions, 1st edn. Jossey-Bass
Burbules N, Callister T Jr. (2019) Watch it: the risks and promises of information technologies for education, 1st edn. Routledge
Carr N (2011) The shallows: what the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company
Creswell JW, Creswell JD (2018) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th edn. SAGE Publications
Descartes R (1999) Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy, (D. A. Cress (Trans. 4th edn)). Hackett Publishing Company
Dewey J (1933) How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath and Company
Dreyfus HL (2008) On the internet, 2nd edn. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887936
Ennis RH (2011) Critical thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews20112613
European Commission (2022) DigComp 2.2: the digital competence framework for citizens. Publications Office of the European Union
Facione PA (1990) Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. In: Research findings and recommendations. American Philosophical Association
Floridi L (2013) The ethics of information, Reprint edn. Oxford University Press
Foucault M (1982) The archaeology of knowledge: and the discourse on language. Vintage
Freeman S, Eddy S, McDonough M, Smith M (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(23):8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Garrison DR (2016) E-Learning in the 21st Century: a community of inquiry framework for research and practice, 3rd edn. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263
Garrison DR, Vaughan ND (2007) Blended learning in higher education: framework, principles, and guidelines, 1st edn. Jossey-Bass
Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond A (2020) The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review
Jonassen DH (2010) Learning to solve problems: a handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments, 1st edn. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847527
Kahne J, Bowyer B (2019) Can media literacy education increase digital engagement in politics? Learn Media Technol 44(2):211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1601108
Kirschner PA, van Merriënboer JJG (2013) Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educ Psychologist 48(3):169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395
Krippendorff K (2019) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 4th edn. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Laurillard D (2002) Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, 2nd edn. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315012940
Lipman M (2003) Thinking in education, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press
Luckin R, Holmes W (2016) Intelligence unleashed: an argument for ai in education. UCL Knowledge Lab. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475756
Martin F, Stamper B, Flowers C (2020) Examining student perception of readiness for online learning: importance and confidence. Online Lear 24(2). 10.24059/olj.v24i2.2053
Meirbekov A, Maslova I, Gallyamova Z (2022) Digital education tools for critical thinking development. Think Skills Creat 44:101023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101023
Mohammadi M (2023) Digital information literacy, self-directed learning, and personal knowledge management in critical readers: application of idc theory. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn 19(4). 10.58459/rptel.2024.19004
Mokhtari F (2023) Fostering digital literacy in higher education: benefits, challenges and implications. International Journal Of Linguistics Literature Translation 6(10):160–167. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.10.19
Morris TH, Rohs M (2021) Digitization bolstering self-directed learning for information literate adults–A systematic review. Comput Educ Open 2:100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100048
Nussbaum MC (2016) Not for profit: why democracy needs the humanities, Updated edn. Princeton University Press
OECD (2019) Future of education and skills 2030. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Paul R, Elder L (2022) Critical thinking: tools for taking charge of your learning and your life, 4th edn. The Foundation for Critical Thinking
Popper KR (2014) The logic of scientific discovery (Reprint of the 1959 edition). Martino Fine Books
Punie Y, Brecko B, Ferrari A (2013) DIGCOMP: a framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe (EUR 26035). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966
Radianti J, Majchrzak TA, Fromm J, Wohlgenannt I (2020) A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Com & Edu 147:103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Redecker C (2017) European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Redecker C, European Commission (2017) European framework for the digital competence of educators: digcompedu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Redecker C, Punie Y (2017) European framework for the digital competence of educators. DigCompEdu). Joint Research Centre (European Commission). https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Savin-Baden M, Fraser H (2023) Rethinking problem-based learning for the digital age: a practical guide for online settings, 1st edn. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003258322
Schwab K (2017) The fourth industrial revolution, Kindle edn. Crown Currency
Selwyn N (2016) Education and technology: key issues and debates, 2nd edn. Bloomsbury Academic
Siemens G (2013) Learning analytics: the emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Sci 57(10):1380–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498851
Spante M, Hashemi SS, Lundin M, Algers A (2018) Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: systematic review of concept use. Cogent Educ 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143
Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Sci 12(2):257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Vuorikari R, Kluzer S, Punie Y (2022) DigComp 2.2: the digital competence framework for citizens – with new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Joint Research Centre, European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
Watson RT, Webster J (2020) Analysing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review a roadmap for release 2.0. J Decis Syst 29(3):129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1798591
Weller M (2011) The digital scholar: how technology is transforming academic practice. Bloomsbury Academic
Wittgenstein L (P. M. S. Hacker & J. Schulte (Eds) (2009) Philosophical investigations, 4th edn. Wiley-Blackwell
World Economic Forum (2020) The future of jobs report 2020. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/
Yuan L, Powell S (2013) MOOCs and open Education: implications for higher Education. JISC CETIS, Glasgow
Zimmerman BJ (2002) Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Pract 41(2):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Funding
This research did not receive any funding from any other organization or individual.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The sole author of this article is fully responsible for all stages of the research, including: idea generation, theoretical framework development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing, content editing, and approval of the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics statement
This article does not involve human or animal research and therefore does not require approval from a research ethics committee. However, the author is committed to adhering to ethical standards in academic research, including honesty, transparency, and objectivity in the collection, analysis, and presentation of data.
Copyright statement
The author confirms that this article is an original research work, not copied or duplicated from any other work. All citations and references are fully acknowledged to ensure compliance with the principles of publication ethics.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, funding, or publication of this article.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Van Vi, T. Critical thinking and digital adaptation in philosophy teaching: an innovative model to develop students’ soft skills in the context of digital transformation. SN Soc Sci 5, 205 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01236-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01236-0