Skip to main content
Log in

Forehead Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 820 Consecutive Cases

  • Original Article
  • Facial Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

An excessively open forehead poses a significant aesthetic problem that can lead to a lack of self-confidence, social weakness, failures in private and business life, and unhappiness due to its impact on perceived ideal facial proportions. The surgical technique for forehead reduction is discussed in the literature from different perspectives, but a single clinical method that is based on a relatively large series covering the current approach, technical details, and results still seems to have potential scientific benefits.

Methods

Between 08/2019 and 01/2025, 820 consecutive forehead reduction surgeries were performed with the same technique. Preoperative markings, site infiltration, incision and dissection details, tissue resection considerations, methods for fixing the advancement flap to the bone, and the subtleties of suturing are discussed. Complications were evaluated. The discomfort of the resulting scars and the patients’ overall satisfaction with the process and outcome were surveyed.

Results

The mean shortened length was 25,5 mm (10–50 mm). The maximum follow-up period was 71 months. Patients rated their satisfaction with the outcome of their procedure on a scale of 1 to 5, and the average satisfaction score was 3,98.

Conclusion

The technique discussed in detail in this study provides a reliable treatment option and improved aesthetic outcomes with few complications for individuals who want an effective and permanent solution to their high forehead.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Min JH, Jung BK, Roh TS, et al. Hairline lowering surgery with bone tunneling suture fixation: effectiveness and safety in 91 patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(5):NP97–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park JH, You SH, Kim N. Frontal hairline lowering with hair transplantation in Asian women with high foreheads. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58(3):360–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holcomb JD, McCollough EG. Trichophytic incisional approaches to upper facial rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:48–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guyuron B, Behmand RA, Green R. Shortening of the long forehead. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:218–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vila PM, Somani SN, Wafford QE, Sidle DM. Forehead reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022;24(1):34–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramirez AL, Ende KH, Kabaker SS. Correction of the high female hairline. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(2):84–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marten TJ. Hairline lowering during foreheadplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(1):224–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Camirand A. Why I no longer use short incisions. Aesthet Surg J. 2001;21(1):65–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn YS, Park YY, Chang JW. Multiplane forehead shortening: sparing the frontalis muscle and supraorbital nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(2):405–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bradford BD, Lee JW. Reconstruction of the forehead and scalp. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2019;27(1):85–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emre Hocaoğlu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Istanbul University prior to the execution of this study (document registration number: 07.11.2023-2235941).

Informed Consent

Informed consent forms were obtained from the patients whose photographs and videos were used. Patients who completed telephone surveys on scar status and satisfaction were also informed that the information collected during these interviews would be used in a scientific study, with confidentiality being maintained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (MP4 93313 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ekizceli, C., Hocaoğlu, E. Forehead Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 820 Consecutive Cases. Aesth Plast Surg (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05421-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05421-7

Keywords

Supplementary file 1 (MP4 93313 KB)