A comparison of marine protected areas and alternative approaches to coral-reef management
- PMID: 16860739
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.062
A comparison of marine protected areas and alternative approaches to coral-reef management
Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) have been widely adopted as the leading tool for coral-reef conservation, but resource users seldom accept them , and many have failed to produce tangible conservation benefits [3]. Few studies have objectively and simultaneously examined the types of MPAs that are most effective in conserving reef resources and the socioeconomic factors responsible for effective conservation [4-6]. We simultaneously explored measures of reef and socioeconomic conservation success at four national parks, four comanaged reserves, and three traditionally managed areas in Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. Underwater visual censuses of key ecological indicators [7, 8] revealed that the average size and biomass of fishes were higher in all areas under traditional management and at one comanaged reserve when compared to nearby unmanaged areas. Socioeconomic assessments [6, 9, 10] revealed that this "effective conservation" was positively related to compliance, visibility of the reserve, and length of time the management had been in place but negatively related to market integration, wealth, and village population size. We suggest that in cases where the resources for enforcement are lacking, management regimes that are designed to meet community goals can achieve greater compliance and subsequent conservation success than regimes designed primarily for biodiversity conservation.
Comment in
-
Conservation biology: beyond marine protected areas.Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 25;16(14):R533-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.043. Curr Biol. 2006. PMID: 16860727
Similar articles
-
Comparison of outcomes of permanently closed and periodically harvested coral reef reserves.Conserv Biol. 2009 Dec;23(6):1475-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01293.x. Epub 2009 Jul 16. Conserv Biol. 2009. PMID: 19624531
-
Conservation biology: beyond marine protected areas.Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 25;16(14):R533-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.043. Curr Biol. 2006. PMID: 16860727
-
Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation.Conserv Biol. 2010 Apr;24(2):531-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01340.x. Epub 2009 Oct 16. Conserv Biol. 2010. PMID: 19843129
-
Confronting the coral reef crisis.Nature. 2004 Jun 24;429(6994):827-33. doi: 10.1038/nature02691. Nature. 2004. PMID: 15215854 Review.
-
Marine protected areas in Sri Lanka: a review.Environ Manage. 2007 Nov;40(5):727-38. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0154-x. Epub 2007 Oct 9. Environ Manage. 2007. PMID: 17929086 Review.
Cited by
-
Best management strategies for sustainable giant clam fishery in French Polynesia islands: answers from a spatial modeling approach.PLoS One. 2013 May 28;8(5):e64641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064641. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23724072 Free PMC article.
-
A Mixed-Method Approach for Quantifying Illegal Fishing and Its Impact on an Endangered Fish Species.PLoS One. 2015 Dec 1;10(12):e0143960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143960. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26625154 Free PMC article.
-
Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0182342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182342. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28806740 Free PMC article.
-
Linking small-scale fisheries co-management to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals.Conserv Biol. 2022 Dec;36(6):e13977. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13977. Epub 2022 Oct 19. Conserv Biol. 2022. PMID: 35866368 Free PMC article.
-
Shifting baselines, local impacts, and global change on coral reefs.PLoS Biol. 2008 Feb;6(2):e54. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060054. PLoS Biol. 2008. PMID: 18303956 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources