This article claims to uncover the core problematics that have made the debate on defining and conceptualizing âreligionâ so difficult and argues that this makes it possible to move beyond radical deconstruction towards reconstructing the concept for scholarly purposes. The argument has four main steps. Step 1 consists of establishing the nature of the entity âreligionâ as a reified imaginative formation. Step 2 consists of identifying the basic dilemma with which scholars have been struggling: the fact that, on the one hand, definitions and conceptualizations do not seem to work unless they stay sufficiently close to commonly held prototypes, while yet, on the other hand, those prototypes are grounded in monotheistic, more specifically Christian, even more specifically Protestant, theological biases about âtrueâ religion. The first line of argument leads to crypto-theological definitions and conceptualizations, the second to a radical deconstruction of the very concept of âreligion.â Step 3 resolves the dilemma by identifying an unexamined assumption, or problematic âblind spot,â that the two lines of argument have in common: they both think that âreligionâ stands against âthe secular.â However, the historical record shows that these two defined themselves not just against one another but, simultaneously, against a third domain (referred to by such terms as âmagicâ or âsuperstitionâ). The structure is therefore not dualistic but triadic. Step 4 consists of replacing common assumptions about how âreligionâ emerged in the early modern period by an interpretation that explains not just its emergence but its logical necessity, at that time, for dealing with the crisis of comparison caused by colonialist expansion. âReligionâ emerged as the tertium comparationis â or, in technically more precise language, the âpre-comparative tertiumâ â that enabled comparison between familiar (monotheist, Christian, Protestant) forms of belief and modes of worship and unfamiliar ones (associated with âpaganâ superstition or magic). If we restore the term to its original function, this allows us to reconstruct âreligionâ as a scholarly concept that not just avoids but prevents any slippage back to Christian theology or ethnocentric bias.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Asad Talal âThe Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Categoryâ Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam 1993 Baltimore and London Johns Hopkins University Press 27 54
Asad Talal âReading a Modern Classic: W. C. Smithâs âThe Meaning and End of Religionââ History of Religions 2001 40 3 205 222
Banton Michael Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion 1966 London Tavistock
Berger Peter & Luckmann Thomas The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge 1991 [1966] Harmondsworth Penguin
Bergunder Michael âWas ist Religion? Kulturwissenschaftliche Ãberlegungen zum Gegenstand der Religionswissenschaftâ Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 2011 19 1â2 3 55
Bergunder Michael âWhat is Religion? The Unexplained Subject Matter of Religious Studiesâ Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 2014 26 3 246 286
Bernand Carmen & Gruzinski Serge De lâidolâtrie: Une archéologie des sciences religieuses 1988 Ãditions du Seuil Paris
Bianchi Ugo The Notion of âReligionâ in Comparative Research: Selected Proceedings of the XVIth Congress of the International Association for the History of Religions, Rome, 3â8 September 1990 1994 Rome âLâErmaâ di Bretschneider
Blasi Anthony J. Swatos William H. âDefinition of Religionâ Encyclopedia of Religion and Society 1998 Walnut Creek Altamira 129 133
Böhme Harmut & Böhme Gernot Das Andere der Vernunft: Zur Entwicklung von Rationalitätsstrukturen am Beispiel Kants 1983 Frankfurt am Main Suhrkamp
Boyer Pascal The Fracture of an Illusion: Science and the Dissolution of Religion 2010 Göttingen Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
Brann Eva T. H. The World of the Imagination: Sum and Substance 1991 Lanham, Md. Rowman and Littlefield
Casadio Giovanni Dijkstra Jitse, Kroesen Justin & Kuiper Yme âReligio versus Religionâ Myths, Martyrs, and Modernity: Studies in the History of Religions in Honour of Jan N. Bremmer 2010 Brill Leiden and Boston 301 326
Chidester David Savage Systems: Colonialism and Comparative Religion in Southern Africa 1996 Charlottesville University Press of Virginia
Clarke Peter B. & Byrne Peter Religion Defined and Explained 1993 New York St. Martinâs Press
Dennett Daniel Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon 2007 Harmondsworth Penguin
Despland Michel La religion en occident: Ãvolution des idées et du vécu 1979 Montreal Fides
Diderot Denis & dâAlembert Jean le Rond Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers par une société de gens de lettres 1765 Vol. 8 Neufchastel Samuel Faulche and Co.
Dubuisson Daniel The Western Construction of Religion: Myths, Knowledge, and Ideology 2003 Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press
Engell James The Creative Imagination: Enlightenment to Romanticism 1981 Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press
Fauconnier Gilles & Turner Mark The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mindâs Hidden Complexities 2002 New York Basic Books
Feil Ernst Religio, vol. 1: Die Geschichte eines neuzeitlichen Grundbegriffs vom Frühchristentum bis zur Reformation 1986 Göttingen Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht
Feil Ernst Religio, vol. 2: Die Geschichte eines neuzeitlichen Grundbegriffs zwischen Reformation und Rationalismus (ca. 1540â1620) 1997 Göttingen Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht
Feil Ernst Religio, vol. 3: Die Geschichte eines neuzeitlichen Grundbegriffs im 17. und frühen 18. Jahrhundert 2001 Göttingen Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht
Fitzgerald Timothy The Ideology of Religious Studies 2000 New York Oxford University Press
Fitzgerald Timothy Discourse on Civility and Barbarity: A Critical History of Religion and Related Categories 2007 New York Oxford University Press
Gibbons Sarah Kantâs Theory of Imagination: Bridging the Gaps in Judgment and Experience 1994 Oxford Clarendon Press
Halbertal Moshe & Margalit Avishai Idolatry 1992 Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press
Hanegraaff Wouter J. Molendijk Arie L. & Pels Peter âThe Emergence of the Academic Science of Magic: The Occult Philosophy in Tylor and Frazerâ Religion in the Making: The Emergence of the Sciences of Religion 1998 Brill Leiden 253 275
Hanegraaff Wouter J. Platvoet Jan G. & Molendijk Arie L. âDefining Religion in Spite of Historyâ The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts, and Contests 1999 Brill Leiden 337 378
Hanegraaff Wouter J. Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture 2012 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Hanegraaff Wouter J. âThe Power of Ideas: Esotericism, Historicism, and the Limits of Discourseâ Religion 2013a 43 2 252 273
Hanegraaff Wouter J. Neugebauer-Wölk Monika, Geffarth Renko & Meumann Markus âThe Notion of âOccult Sciencesâ in the Wake of the Enlightenmentâ Aufklärung und Esoterik: Wege in die Moderne 2013b Berlin De Gruyter 73 95
Hanegraaff Wouter J. Review of Bern-Christian Otto, Magie: Rezeptions- und diskursgeschichtliche Analysen von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit Aries 2014 14 1 114 120
Hanegraaff Wouter J. Bochinger Christoph & Rüpke Jörg âReligion and the Historical Imagination: Esoteric Tradition as Poetic Inventionâ Dynamics of Religion: Past and Present 2016 Berlin De Gruyter 131 153
Harmening Dieter Superstitio: Ãberlieferungs- und theoriegeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur kirchlich-theologischen Aberglaubensliteratur des Mittelalters 1979 Berlin Erich Schmidt
Harrison Peter âReligionâ and the Religions in the English Enlightenment 1990 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Jardine Nick âEtics and Emics (Not to Mention Anemics and Emetics) in the History of the Sciencesâ History of Science 2004 42 3 261 278
Jong Albert de Traditions of the Magi: Zoroastrianism in Greek and Latin Literature 1997 Leiden Brill
King Richard Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, India, and âThe Mystic Eastâ 1999 London and New York Routledge
Kneller Jane Kant and the Power of Imagination 2007 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Kripal Jeffrey J., Anzali Ata, Jain Andrea R. & Prophet Erin Comparing Religions: Coming to Terms 2014 Malden, Mass. Wiley Blackwell
Krzeszowski Tomasz P. Fisiak Jacek âTertium Comparationisâ Contrastive Linguistics: Prospects and Problems 1981 Berlin and New York Mouton 301 312
Lakoff George Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind 1987 Chicago University of Chicago Press
Lambert Yves âLa âTour de Babelâ des définitions de la Religionâ Social Compass 1991 38 1 73 85
Martin Dale B. Inventing Superstition: From the Hippocratics to the Christians 2004 Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press
Masuzawa Tomoko The Invention of World Religions, or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism 2005 Chicago University of Chicago Press
McCutcheon Russell T. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia 1997 New York Oxford University Press
McCutcheon Russell T. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion 2001 Albany State University of New York Press
McKinnon Andrew M. âSociological Definitions, Language Games, and the âEssenceâ of Religionâ Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 2002 14 1 61 83
Medin Douglas & Ortony Andrew Vosniadou Stella & Ortony Andrew âPsychological Essentialismâ Similarity and Analogical Reasoning 1989 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 179 195
Nongbri Brent Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept 2013 New Haven Yale University Press
Otto Bernd Christian Magie: Rezeptions- und diskursgeschichtliche Analysen von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit 2011 Berlin De Gruyter
Platvoet Jan G. Platvoet Jan G. & Molendijk Arie L. âTo Define or Not to Define: The Problem of the Definition of Religionâ The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts, and Contests 1999a Brill Leiden 245 265
Platvoet Jan G. Platvoet Jan G. & Molendijk Arie L. âContexts, Concepts and Contests: Towards a Pragmatics of Defining âReligionââ The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts, and Contests 1999b Brill Leiden 463 516
Robinson Richard Definition 1954 London Clarendon Press
Saler Benson Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendant Natives, and Unbounded Categories 2000 [1993] New York Berghahn
Schaffalitzky de Muckadell Caroline âOn Essentialism and Real Definitions of Religionâ Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2014 82 2 495 520
Schilbrack Kevin âReligion, Models of, and Reality: Are We Through with Geertz?â Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2005 73 2 429 452
Schilbrack Kevin âThe Social Construction of âReligionâ and Its Limits: A Critical Reading of Timothy Fitzgeraldâ Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 2012 24 2 97 117
Schilbrack Kevin âAfter We Deconstruct âReligion,â Then What? A Case for Critical Realismâ Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 2013 25 1 107 112
Schilbrack Kevin Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto 2014 Chichester Wiley Blackwell
Smith Jonathan Z. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown 1982 Chicago University of Chicago Press
Smith Jonathan Z. Taylor Mark C. âReligion, Religions, Religiousâ Critical Terms for Religious Studies 1998 Chicago University of Chicago Press 269 284
Smith Wilfred Cantwell The Meaning and End of Religion 1991 [1962] Minneapolis Fortress Press
Snoek Jan A. M. Bianchi Ugo âClassification and Definition Theory, an Overviewâ The Notion of âReligionâ in Comparative Research: Selected Proceedings of the XVIth Congress of the International Association for the History of Religions, Rome, 3â8 September 1990 1994 Rome âLâErmaâ di Bretschneider 741 754
Snoek Jan A. M. Platvoet Jan G. & Molendijk Arie L. âDefining âReligionsâ as the Domain of Study of the Empirical Sciences of Religionâ The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts, and Contests 1999 Brill Leiden 313 333
Spiro Melford E. Banton Michael âReligion: Problems of Definition and Explanationâ Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion 1966 London Tavistock 85 126
Stausberg Michael & Gardiner Mark Q. Stausberg Michael & Engler Steven âDefinitionâ The Oxford Handbook of the Study of Religion 2016 Oxford Oxford University Press
Styers Randall Making Magic: Religion, Magic, and Science in the Modern World 2004 New York Oxford University Press
Taves Ann âNo Field Is an Island: Fostering Collaboration between the Academic Study of Religion and the Sciencesâ Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 2010 22 2â3 170 188
Taves Ann â2010 Presidential Address: âReligionâ in the Humanities and the Humanities in the Universityâ Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2011 79 2 287 314
Taves Ann âReverse Engineering Complex Cultural Concepts: Identifying Building Blocks of âReligionââ Journal of Cognition and Culture 2015 15 1â2 191 216
Traut Lucia & Wilke Annette Religion â Imagination â Ãsthetik: Vorstellungs- und Sinneswelten in Religion und Kultur 2015 Göttingen Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht
Tylor Edward B. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom 1913 Vol. 1 5th ed. London John Murray
Warnock Mary Imagination 1976 Berkeley and Los Angeles University of California Press
Warnock Mary Imagination and Time 1994 Oxford and Cambridge, Mass. Blackwell
Weber Ralph âComparative Philosophy and the Tertium: Comparing What with What, and in What Respect?â Dao 2014 13 2 151 171
Wilson Brian C. Idinopulos Thomas A. & Wilson Brian C. âFrom the Lexical to the Polythetic: A Brief History of the Definition of Religionâ What is Religion?: Origins, Definitions, and Explanations 1998 Leiden Brill 141 162
Zollna Isabel Einbildungskraft (imagination) und Bild (image) in den Sprachtheorien um 1800: Ein Vergleich zwischen Frankreich und Deutschland 1990 Tübingen Gunter Narr Verlag
Warnock 1976: 13â71; cf. Warnock 1994: 1â16. Specifically about the imagination in Kant, see Böhme and Böhme 1983: 231â250; Gibbons 1994; and the particularly impressive analysis in Kneller 2007. For a historically more detailed while philosophically less precise overview of Enlightenment understandings of imagination, see Engell 1981; for a comprehensive discussion, see Brann 1991. The current neglect of the imagination as a key term in the study of religion is emphasized in Traut and Wilke 2015 and Hanegraaff 2016. To forestall some questions and potential misunderstandings about my argument on the following pages (e.g., concerning my understandings of such terms as âideasâ or âconcepts;â my assumptions about mental processes such as perception, projection, or reification; my dismissal of real definitions; as well as my understanding of methodological agnosticism), it may be useful to point out that my philosophical and methodological commitments are essentially Kantian (cf. Hanegraaff 2013a: 254).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 960 | 180 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 380 | 12 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 337 | 27 | 2 |
This article claims to uncover the core problematics that have made the debate on defining and conceptualizing âreligionâ so difficult and argues that this makes it possible to move beyond radical deconstruction towards reconstructing the concept for scholarly purposes. The argument has four main steps. Step 1 consists of establishing the nature of the entity âreligionâ as a reified imaginative formation. Step 2 consists of identifying the basic dilemma with which scholars have been struggling: the fact that, on the one hand, definitions and conceptualizations do not seem to work unless they stay sufficiently close to commonly held prototypes, while yet, on the other hand, those prototypes are grounded in monotheistic, more specifically Christian, even more specifically Protestant, theological biases about âtrueâ religion. The first line of argument leads to crypto-theological definitions and conceptualizations, the second to a radical deconstruction of the very concept of âreligion.â Step 3 resolves the dilemma by identifying an unexamined assumption, or problematic âblind spot,â that the two lines of argument have in common: they both think that âreligionâ stands against âthe secular.â However, the historical record shows that these two defined themselves not just against one another but, simultaneously, against a third domain (referred to by such terms as âmagicâ or âsuperstitionâ). The structure is therefore not dualistic but triadic. Step 4 consists of replacing common assumptions about how âreligionâ emerged in the early modern period by an interpretation that explains not just its emergence but its logical necessity, at that time, for dealing with the crisis of comparison caused by colonialist expansion. âReligionâ emerged as the tertium comparationis â or, in technically more precise language, the âpre-comparative tertiumâ â that enabled comparison between familiar (monotheist, Christian, Protestant) forms of belief and modes of worship and unfamiliar ones (associated with âpaganâ superstition or magic). If we restore the term to its original function, this allows us to reconstruct âreligionâ as a scholarly concept that not just avoids but prevents any slippage back to Christian theology or ethnocentric bias.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 960 | 180 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 380 | 12 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 337 | 27 | 2 |