Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The violent collisional history of aqueously evolved (2) Pallas

Nature Astronomy volume 4, pages 569–576 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Asteroid (2) Pallas is the largest main-belt object not yet visited by a spacecraft, making its surface geology largely unknown and limiting our understanding of its origin and collisional evolution. Previous ground-based observational campaigns returned different estimates of its bulk density that are inconsistent with one another, one measurement1 being compatible within error bars with the icy Ceres (2.16 ± 0.01 g cm−3)2 and the other3 compatible within error bars with the rocky Vesta (3.46 ± 0.03 g cm−3)4. Here we report high-angular-resolution observations of Pallas performed with the extreme adaptive optics-fed SPHERE imager5 on the Very Large Telescope. Pallas records a violent collisional history, with numerous craters larger than 30 km in diameter populating its surface and two large impact basins that could be related to a family-forming impact. Monte Carlo simulations of the collisional evolution of the main belt correlate this cratering record to the high average impact velocity of ~11.5 km s−1 on Pallas—compared with an average of ~5.8 km s−1 for the asteroid belt—induced by Pallas’s high orbital inclination (i = 34.8°) and orbital eccentricity (e = 0.23). Compositionally, Pallas’s derived bulk density of 2.89 ± 0.08 g cm−3 (1σ uncertainty) is fully compatible with a CM chondrite-like body, as suggested by its spectral reflectance in the 3 μm wavelength region6. A bright spot observed on its surface may indicate an enrichment in salts during an early phase of aqueous alteration, compatible with Pallas’s relatively high albedo of 12–17% (refs. 7,8), although alternative origins are conceivable.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The two hemispheres of (2) Pallas as seen by VLT/SPHERE.
Fig. 2: Deconvolved images of (2) Pallas, compared with projections of the ADAM shape model and sketches highlighting the main geological features identified on Pallas.
Fig. 3: Mollweide projection of the 36 craters and the bright spot identified on the surface of Pallas.
Fig. 4: N-body simulations link the heavily cratered surface of Pallas to its highly inclined and eccentric orbit inducing a high average impact speed on this body.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

As soon as papers for our large programme are accepted for publication, we will make the corresponding reduced and deconvolved adaptive optics images and three-dimensional shape models publicly available at http://observations.lam.fr/astero/.

Code availability

The code used to generate the three-dimensional shape is available at https://github.com/matvii/ADAM. The modified SWIFT integrator used to model the orbital evolution of the Pallas family is available at http://sirrah.troja.mff.cuni.cz/mira/mp/.

References

  1. Schmidt, B. E. et al. The shape and surface variation of 2 Pallas from the Hubble Space Telescope. Science 326, 275–278 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Park, R. S. et al. A partially differentiated interior for (1) Ceres deduced from its gravity field and shape. Nature 537, 515–517 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carry, B. et al. Physical properties of (2) Pallas. Icarus 205, 460–472 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Russell, C. T. et al. Dawn at Vesta: testing the protoplanetary paradigm. Science 336, 684–686 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beuzit, J. L. et al. SPHERE: the exoplanet imager for the Very Large Telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 631, A155 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Larson, H. P., Feierberg, M. A. & Lebofsky, L. A. The composition of asteroid 2 Pallas and its relation to primitive meteorites. Icarus 56, 398–408 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tedesco, E. F., Noah, P. V., Noah, M. & Price, S. D. The supplemental IRAS minor planet survey. Astron. J. 123, 1056–1085 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alí-Lagoa, V., Müller, T. G., Usui, F. & Hasegawa, S. The AKARI IRC asteroid flux catalogue: updated diameters and albedos. Astron. Astrophys. 612, A85 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thalmann, C. et al. SPHERE ZIMPOL: overview and performance simulation. Proc. SPIE 7014, 70143F (2008).

  10. Vernazza, P. et al. The impact crater at the origin of the Julia family detected with VLT/SPHERE? Astron. Astrophys. 618, A154 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fusco, T. et al. Deconvolution of astronomical images obtained from ground-based telescopes with adaptive optics. Proc. SPIE 4839, 1065–1075 (2003).

  12. Mugnier, L. M., Fusco, T. & Conan, J.-M. MISTRAL: a myopic edge-preserving image restoration method, with application to astronomical adaptive-optics-corrected long-exposure images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 1841–1854 (2004).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Fétick, R. J. et al. Closing the gap between Earth-based and interplanet. mission observations: Vesta seen by VLT/SPHERE. Astron. Astrophys. 623, A6 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Scully, J. E. C. et al. Ceres’ Ezinu quadrangle: a heavily cratered region with evidence for localized subsurface water ice and the context of Occator crater. Icarus 316, 46–62 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmedemann, N. et al. The cratering record, chronology and surface ages of (4) Vesta in comparison to smaller asteroids and the ages of HED meteorites. Planet. Space Sci. 103, 104–130 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hiesinger, H. et al. Cratering on Ceres: implications for its crust and evolution. Science 353, aaf4759 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Melosh, H. J. Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process (Oxford Univ. Press,1989).

  18. Gladman, B. J. et al. On the asteroid belt’s orbital and size distribution. Icarus 202, 104–118 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Viikinkoski, M., Kaasalainen, M. & Durech, J. ADAM: a general method for using various data types in asteroid reconstruction. Astron. Astrophys. 576, A8 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schenk, P. et al. The geologically recent giant impact basins at Vesta’s south pole. Science 336, 694–697 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Consolmagno, G., Britt, D. & Macke, R. The significance of meteorite density and porosity. Chem. Erde Geochem. 68, 1–29 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vernazza, P. et al. Compositional homogeneity of CM parent bodies. Astron. J. 152, 54 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Doyle, P. M. et al. Early aqueous activity on the ordinary and carbonaceous chondrite parent bodies recorded by fayalite. Nat. Commun. 6, 7444 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Masiero, J. R. et al. Preliminary analysis of WISE/NEOWISE 3-band cryogenic and post-cryogenic observations of main belt asteroids. Astrophys. J. 759, L8 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nathues, A. et al. Sublimation in bright spots on (1) Ceres. Nature 528, 237–240 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. de León, J., Campins, H., Tsiganis, K., Morbidelli, A. & Licandro, J. Origin of the near-earth asteroid Phaethon and the Geminids meteor shower. Astron. Astrophys. 513, A26 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Todorović, N. The dynamical connection between Phaethon and Pallas. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 601–604 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., Llorca, J., Borovička, J. & Fabregat, J. Spectroscopy of a Geminid fireball: its similarity to cometary meteoroids and the nature of its parent body. Earth Moon Planets 95, 375–387 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Borovička, J., Koten, P., Spurný, P., Boček, J. & Štork, R. A survey of meteor spectra and orbits: evidence for three populations of Na-free meteoroids. Icarus 174, 15–30 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Borovička, J. Spectroscopic analysis of Geminid meteors. In Proc. 26th International Meteor Conference Bareges, France, 2007 (eds Rendtel, J. & Vaubaillon, J.) 42–51 (International Meteor Organization, 2010).

  31. Kasuga, T., Watanabe, J. & Ebizuka, N. A 2004 Geminid meteor spectrum in the visible-ultraviolet region. Extreme Na depletion? Astron. Astrophys. 438, L17–L20 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kasuga, T. Thermal evolution of the Phaethon-Geminid stream complex. Earth Moon Planets 105, 321–326 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Whipple, F. L. 1983 TB and the Geminid meteors. IAU Circular 3881 (1983).

  34. Liu, Z. et al. A global database and statistical analyses of (4) Vesta craters. Icarus 311, 242–257 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Marchi, S. et al. The violent collisional history of asteroid 4 Vesta. Science 336, 690–694 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Marchi, S. et al. The missing large impact craters on Ceres. Nat. Commun. 7, 12257 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pasckert, J. H. et al. Geologic mapping of the Ac-2 Coniraya quadrangle of Ceres from NASA’s Dawn mission: implications for a heterogeneously composed crust. Icarus 316, 28–45 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorný, D. & Levison, H. F. Asteroids were born big. Icarus 204, 558–573 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cibulková, H., Brož, M. & Benavidez, P. G. A six-part collisional model of the main asteroid belt. Icarus 241, 358–372 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Werner, S. C. & Ivanov, B. A. in Treatise on Geophysics (ed. Schubert, G.) 2nd edn 327–365 (Elsevier, 2015).

  41. Viikinkoski, M. et al. VLT/SPHERE- and ALMA-based shape reconstruction of asteroid (3) Juno. Astron. Astrophys. 581, L3 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Viikinkoski, M. Shape Reconstruction from Generalized Projections. PhD thesis, Tampere Univ. Technology (2016).

  43. Marsset, M. et al. 3D shape of asteroid (6) Hebe from VLT/SPHERE imaging: implications for the origin of ordinary H chondrites. Astron. Astrophys. 604, A64 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hanuš, J., Marchis, F., Viikinkoski, M., Yang, B. & Kaasalainen, M. Shape model of asteroid (130) Elektra from optical photometry and disk-resolved images from VLT/SPHERE and Nirc2/Keck. Astron. Astrophys. 599, A36 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. McLean, I. S. & Chaffee, F. H. Instrumentation for the Keck Observatory. Proc. SPIE 4008, 2–7 (2000).

  46. Burns, J. A. & Safronov, V. S. Asteroid nutation angles. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 165, 403–411 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chambat, F., Ricard, Y. & Valette, B. Flattening of the Earth: further from hydrostaticity than previously estimated. Geophys. J. Int. 183, 727–732 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rambaux, N., Chambat, F. & Castillo-Rogez, J. C. Third-order development of shape, gravity, and moment of inertia for highly flattened celestial bodies. Application to Ceres. Astron. Astrophys. 584, A127 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lanzano, P. The equilibrium of a rotating body of arbitrary density. Astrophys. Space Sci. 29, 161–178 (1974).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Nesvorný, D., Brož, M. & Carruba, V. in Asteroids IV (eds Michel, P. et al.) 297–321 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2015).

  51. Mainzer, A. et al. NEOWISE Diameters and Albedos V2.0 (NASA Planetary Data System, 2019); https://sbn.psi.edu/pds/resource/neowisediam.html

  52. Ivezić, Ž. et al. Color confirmation of asteroid families. Astron. J. 124, 2943–2948 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Quinn, T. R., Tremaine, S. & Duncan, M. A three million year integration of the Earth’s orbit. Astron. J. 101, 2287–2305 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Levison, H. F. & Duncan, M. J. The long-term dynamical behavior of short-period comets. Icarus 108, 18–36 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Brož, M., Vokrouhlický, D., Morbidelli, A., Nesvorný, D. & Bottke, W. F. Did the Hilda collisional family form during the late heavy bombardment? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 2716–2727 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Vokrouhlický, D. Diurnal Yarkovsky effect as a source of mobility of meter-sized asteroidal fragments. I. Linear theory. Astron. Astrophys. 335, 1093–1100 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Vokrouhlický, D. & Farinella, P. The Yarkovsky seasonal effect on asteroidal fragments: a nonlinearized theory for spherical bodies. Astron. J. 118, 3049–3060 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Čapek, D. & Vokrouhlický, D. The YORP effect with finite thermal conductivity. Icarus 172, 526–536 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Farinella, P., Froeschlé, C. & Gonczi, R. Meteorite delivery and transport. IAU Symp. 160, 205–222 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Alí-Lagoa, V. et al. Differences between the Pallas collisional family and similarly sized B-type asteroids. Astron. Astrophys. 591, A14 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Brož, M. & Morbidelli, A. A study of 3-dimensional shapes of asteroid families with an application to Eos. Icarus 317, 434–441 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. Benz, W. & Asphaug, E. Impact simulations with fracture I—Method and tests. Icarus 107, 98–116 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jutzi, M., Holsapple, K., Wünneman, K. & Michel, P. in Asteroids IV (eds Michel, P. et al.) 679–699 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2015).

  64. Ševeček, P. et al. SPH/N-body simulations of small (D = 10 km) asteroidal breakups and improved parametric relations for Monte-Carlo collisional models. Icarus 296, 239–256 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Richardson, D. C., Quinn, T., Stadel, J. & Lake, G. Direct large-scale N-body simulations of planetesimal dynamics. Icarus 143, 45–59 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Tillotson, J. H. Metallic Equations of State for Hypervelocity Impact GA–3216 (General Dynamics, 1962).

  67. von Mises, R. Mechanik der festen krper im plastisch- deformablen zustand. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Gott. Math. Phys. Klasse 4, 582–592 (1913).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Grady, D. & Kipp, M. Continuum modelling of explosive fracture in oil shale. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 17, 147–157 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Benz, W. & Asphaug, E. Simulations of brittle solids using smooth particle hydrodynamics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 87, 253–265 (1995).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Bottke, W. F. & Greenberg, R. Asteroidal collision probabilities. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 879–881 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. Bottke, W. F. et al. Linking the collisional history of the main asteroid belt to its dynamical excitation and depletion. Icarus 179, 63–94 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. Benz, W. & Asphaug, E. Catastrophic disruptions revisited. Icarus 142, 5–20 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. Vilas, F. & Gaffey, M. J. Phyllosilicate absorption features in main-belt and outer-belt asteroid reflectance spectra. Science 246, 790–792 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. Fornasier, S., Lantz, C., Barucci, M. A. & Lazzarin, M. Aqueous alteration on main belt primitive asteroids: results from visible spectroscopy. Icarus 233, 163–178 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. Cloutis, E. A. et al. Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites 4: aqueously altered and thermally metamorphosed meteorites. Icarus 220, 586–617 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. Lantz, C. et al. Ion irradiation of carbonaceous chondrites: a new view of space weathering on primitive asteroids. Icarus 285, 43–57 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. Rivkin, A. S., Asphaug, E. & Bottke, W. F. The case of the missing Ceres family. Icarus 243, 429–439 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. Castillo-Rogez, J. et al. Insights into Ceres’s evolution from surface composition. Meteorit. Planet. Sci 53, 1820–1843 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. Howard, K. T., Benedix, G. K., Bland, P. A. & Cressey, G. Modal mineralogy of CM chondrites by X-ray diffraction (PSD-XRD): Part 2. degree, nature and settings of aqueous alteration. Geochim. Cosmochim. A 75, 2735–2751 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. Alí-Lagoa, V. et al. Physical properties of B-type asteroids from WISE data. Astron. Astrophys. 554, A71 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Castillo-Rogez, J. C. et al. Iapetus’ geophysics: rotation rate, shape, and equatorial ridge. Icarus 190, 179–202 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. Schmidt, B. E. & Castillo-Rogez, J. C. Water, heat, bombardment: the evolution and current state of (2) Pallas. Icarus 218, 478–488 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. Opeil, C. P., Consolmagno, G. J. & Britt, D. T. The thermal conductivity of meteorites: new measurements and analysis. Icarus 208, 449–454 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. Dufresne, E. R. & Anders, E. On the chemical evolution of the carbonaceous chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. A 26, 1085–1114 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  85. Bland, P. A. & Travis, B. J. Giant convecting mud balls of the early Solar System. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602514 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. Carry, B. et al. Homogeneous internal structure of CM-like asteroid (41) Daphne. Astron. Astrophys. 623, A132 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Alí-Lagoa, V. et al. Differences between the Pallas collisional family and similarly sized B-type asteroids. Astron. Astrophys. 591, A14 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Hanuš, J. et al. Shape, size, physical properties and nature of low-perihelion near-Earth asteroid (3200) Phaethon. In Proc. 48th AAS Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting 516.08 (American Astronomical Society, 2016).

  89. Masiero, J. R., Wright, E. L. & Mainzer, A. K. Thermophysical modeling of NEOWISE observations of DESTINY+ targets phaethon and 2005 UD. Astron. J. 158, 97 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  90. Kareta, T. et al. Rotationally resolved spectroscopic characterization of near-Earth object (3200) Phaethon. Astron. J. 156, 287 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  91. Ito, T. et al. Extremely strong polarization of an active asteroid (3200) Phaethon. Nat. Commun. 9, 2486 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. Cellino, A. et al. On the calibration of the relation between geometric albedo and polarimetric properties for the asteroids. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 3473–3488 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  93. Lupishko, D. F. Generalized calibration of the polarimetric albedo scale of asteroids. Solar Syst. Res. 52, 98–114 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  94. Devogèle, M. et al. The phase-polarization curve of asteroid (3200) Phaethon. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 3498–3508 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. Shinnaka, Y. et al. Inversion angle of phase-polarization curve of near-Earth asteroid (3200) Phaethon. Astrophys. J. Lett. 864, L33 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  96. Takir, D. et al. 3-μm spectroscopy of asteroid (3200) Phaethon: implications for B-asteroids. In Proc. 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2624 (LPI, 2018).

  97. Arai, T. et al. DESTINY+ mission: flyby of Geminids parent asteroid (3200) Phaethon and in-situ analyses of dust accreting on the Earth. In Proc. 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2570 (LPI, 2018).

  98. Gardner, J. P. et al. The James Webb Space Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 123, 485–606 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Based on observations collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere under ESO programme 199.C-0074 (principal investigator: P.V.). This research has made use of the Keck Observatory Archive (KOA), which is operated by the W. M. Keck Observatory and the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute (NExScI), under contract with NASA. M.M. was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under grant number 80NSSC18K0849 issued through the Planetary Astronomy Program. This work was supported by the French Direction Générale de l’Armement (DGA) and Aix-Marseille Université (AMU). P.V., A.D. and B.C. were supported by CNRS/INSU/PNP. J.H., J.D. and P.S. were supported by the grant 18-09470S of the Czech Science Foundation and by the Charles University Research Programme number UNCE/SCI/023. M.Brož was supported by the grant 18-04514J of the Czech Science Foundation. E.J. is a F.R.S.-FNRS Senior Research Associate. The work of T.S.-R. was carried out through grant APOSTD/2019/046 by Generalitat Valenciana (Spain). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 730890. This material reflects only the authors’ views and the commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Michaël Marsset

  2. Astrophysics Research Centre, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK

    Michaël Marsset

  3. Institute of Astronomy, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

    Miroslav Brož, Josef Hanuš, Pavel Ševeček & Josef Ďurech

  4. Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CNES, Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille, Marseille, France

    Pierre Vernazza, Alexis Drouard, Laurent Jorda, Marin Ferrais, Romain Fétick, Thierry Fusco, Philippe Lamy, Hervé Le Coroller & Arthur Vigan

  5. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

    Julie Castillo-Rogez

  6. Mathematics and Statistics, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Matti Viikinkoski & Mikko Kaasalainen

  7. IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, Paris, France

    Nicolas Rambaux, Mirel Birlan, Jérôme Berthier, François Colas & Frédéric Vachier

  8. Université Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, Nice, France

    Benoît Carry, Patrick Michel & Paolo Tanga

  9. Astronomical Institute of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

    Mirel Birlan

  10. SETI Institute, Carl Sagan Center, Mountain View, CA, USA

    Franck Marchis

  11. Astronomical Observatory Institute, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

    Edyta Podlewska-Gaca, Przemyslaw Bartczak, Grzegorz Dudziński, Agnieszka Kryszczynska, Anna Marciniak & Tadeusz Michalowski

  12. Institute of Physics, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland

    Edyta Podlewska-Gaca

  13. School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Erik Asphaug

  14. European Space Agency, ESTEC – Scientific Support Office, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

    Fabrice Cipriani & Olivier Witasse

  15. TMT Observatory, Pasadena, CA, USA

    Christophe Dumas

  16. Space Sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research Institute, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium

    Marin Ferrais & Emmanuel Jehin

  17. ONERA, The French Aerospace Lab, Châtillon, France

    Thierry Fusco

  18. Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

    Derek C. Richardson

  19. Departamento de Física, Ingeniería de Sistemas y Teoría de la Señal, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain

    Toni Santana-Ros

  20. Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, Universitat de Barcelona (IEEC-UB), Barcelona, Spain

    Toni Santana-Ros

  21. European Southern Observatory (ESO), Santiago, Chile

    Bin Yang

Authors
  1. Michaël Marsset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miroslav Brož
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pierre Vernazza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexis Drouard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Julie Castillo-Rogez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Josef Hanuš
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Matti Viikinkoski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nicolas Rambaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Benoît Carry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Laurent Jorda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. Pavel Ševeček
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mirel Birlan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  13. Franck Marchis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  14. Edyta Podlewska-Gaca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  15. Erik Asphaug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  16. Przemyslaw Bartczak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jérôme Berthier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  18. Fabrice Cipriani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  19. François Colas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  20. Grzegorz Dudziński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  21. Christophe Dumas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  22. Josef ÄŽurech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  23. Marin Ferrais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  24. Romain Fétick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  25. Thierry Fusco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  26. Emmanuel Jehin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  27. Mikko Kaasalainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  28. Agnieszka Kryszczynska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  29. Philippe Lamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  30. Hervé Le Coroller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  31. Anna Marciniak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  32. Tadeusz Michalowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  33. Patrick Michel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  34. Derek C. Richardson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  35. Toni Santana-Ros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  36. Paolo Tanga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  37. Frédéric Vachier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  38. Arthur Vigan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  39. Olivier Witasse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  40. Bin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.V. is the principal investigator of the ESO large survey that acquired the images of Pallas. M.M. and P.V. designed and operated the survey in service mode. M.M. led the research on Pallas. M.M., P.V., R.F. and T.F. reduced and deconvolved the SPHERE images. A.D. performed the crater analysis. M.Brož analysed the Pallas family and ran the N-body and SPH simulations. D.C.R and E.A. provided some of the numerical codes used for the simulations. B.C. and J.H. retrieved earlier disk-resolved and disk-integrated data for Pallas from the literature. M.V. and J.H. reconstructed the three-dimensional shape of Pallas. N.R. and L.J. analysed the shape. B.C. provided the mass estimate. J.C.-R. performed the compositional analysis and thermophysical modelling of Pallas. M.M., M.Brož, P.V. and J.C.-R. worked jointly to write the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaël Marsset.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Astronomy thanks Julia de Leon and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–11, Supplementary Tables 1–8 and corresponding references.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marsset, M., Brož, M., Vernazza, P. et al. The violent collisional history of aqueously evolved (2) Pallas. Nat Astron 4, 569–576 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-1007-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-1007-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing