MotorsForEfficiency PDF
MotorsForEfficiency PDF
Motor
New designs
aim to boost
efficiency
MAKEOVER
levels.
Authored by:
Frances Richards
Contributing Editor
Key points:
• It is possible to find superefficient high-horsepower
motors but, at this point, many of these are exotic
designs that are practical for limited applications.
• Special motor designs may begin replacing
induction motors as worldwide efficiency
regulations grow ever-more stringent.
Resources
Baldor Electric Co., www.baldor.com
Comparing efficient motors, machinedesign.com/
article/how-s-your-motor-iq-0405?page=0%2C1
Copper rotor induction motors, machinedesign.
com/article/industry-could-take-a-shine-to-copper-
rotor-motors-0906
IPM versus three-phase induction motors,
This 800-hp medium-voltage machinedesign.com/article/motors-move-toward-
induction motor is employed in more-efficiency-0410
a copper ore plant. Switched reluctance motors, machinedesign.com/
article/the-switch-to-switched-reluctance-1211
For more on green technology,
Continuing headlines about superefficient electric drives might lead scan this code or go to: http://
machinedesign.com/article/
some observers to wonder about the future of three-phase induction green-technology-more-efficient-
motors. The truth is that induction motors aren’t going away any time motors-0619
soon. In fact, they just keep getting better as improved materials continue
to make possible more-efficient designs.
Government legislation supports these efforts: In the U. S., EISA (the
Energy Independence and Security Act) went into effect in 2010, man-
dating higher efficiency standards for general-purpose, three-phase ac like induction motors, which induce a
industrial motors from 1 to 500 hp manufactured for domestic use. Eu- secondary magnetic field in the rotor,
rope has similar regulations. As of June 2011, the EU only permits mo- PM motors use high-performance ro-
tors with efficiency class IE2 (International Efficiency), a boost in effi- tor magnets to create a magnetic field
ciency by up to 7% compared to older IEC designs. By 2017, only motors that is always present. This eliminates the
with an IE3 efficiency class will be permitted there. These motors have secondary circuit rotor I 2R (heat) losses
efficiencies up to 10% higher than older IEC designs and already make found in the induction-motor design,
economic sense because of their high energy-saving potential. resulting in higher efficiency and a better
However, at some point the law of diminishing returns kicks in. With power factor to boot.
motors operating in the 90%-plus efficiency range for most ratings, there Rating for rating, PM-rotor technol-
isn’t much more room for improvement. Laws of physics make it prohibi- ogy is simply more efficient than induc-
tive to design ac-induction motors with higher efficiencies. tion technology. So, will PM motors com-
This is where alternative motor designs begin to make sense. As pletely replace induction designs one day
one example, consider permanent-magnet (PM) rotor technology. Un- soon? Most industry experts think not.
74 MACHINE DESIGN.com APRIL 11, 2013
MOTORS TECHNOLOGY GUIDE
The iiird
windings
use expensive mag-
ne t s . S a l i e nt - p ol e
PM motors also offer
high efficiency and
high torque density,
generation
but feature perma-
nent excitation and
expensive magnets Rotor
like their nonsalient teeth
counterparts.
Cross section of a switched-
has arrived!
Synchronous-re- reluctance motor showing
luctance designs work laminations and concentrated
at high efficiency and stator windings (red and yellow)
high torque density and salient-pole rotor teeth.
without the need for
generation
permanent excitation
or permanent magnets. However, they only offer a low
power factor and limited high-speeds. Finally, switched-
reluctance designs offer high-speeds and high-torque
density, along with no need for permanent excitation or
The iiird
permanent magnets. Their drawbacks include acoustic
noise, torque ripple, rotor-core loss, high fundamental
frequency, and the need for a six-lead connection. MD
Advanced motor technologies such as PM and hybrid designs offer substantial energy savings through higher efficiency and reduced losses . These savings are crucial in industrial settings where energy costs are a significant part of operational expenses. Improved efficiency not only reduces energy usage but also results in lower heat generation, lessening cooling requirements and extending motor lifespan . However, the initial investment in high-efficiency motors like PM designs could be higher, impacting short-term financial feasibility despite the long-term savings .
Switched-reluctance motors offer advantages in high-speed applications due to their simple rotor structure without magnets or windings, leading to lower production costs and minimal rotor losses . However, they may also present drawbacks such as acoustic noise, torque ripple, and high core losses at elevated frequencies . These factors can impact performance under high dynamic conditions, making noise and vibrations potential concerns in applications like motion control and traction .
Government efficiency regulations act as a catalyst for transitioning to alternative motor designs by setting higher standards that current technologies struggle to meet . As regulations tighten, manufacturers are pressured to innovate beyond the diminishing returns seen in traditional induction motor technology . This pressure can lead to increased adoption of PM, switched-reluctance, and other advanced motor designs that provide higher efficiency and lower operational costs, aligning with regulatory goals for reduced energy consumption and environmental impact .
High-frequency harmonics introduced by inverters can distort current and voltage waveforms, complicating efficiency comparisons among motors since these waveforms deviate from ideal sinusoids . These distortions can increase losses due to additional heat generation within the motor, particularly in designs like switched-reluctance motors where the drive waveforms inherently deviate from sinusoidal forms . As such, efficiency assessments typically assume ideal waveforms to provide a consistent basis for comparison, though this may not accurately reflect real-world performance .
Three-phase induction motors benefit from government regulations like the U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) and European efficiency standards that mandate higher efficiency classes such as IE2 and IE3 . These regulations push manufacturers to improve motor designs, achieving efficiencies up to 10% higher than older models, thus saving energy and costs . However, these improvements are limited by the laws of physics as motors operating in the 90%-plus efficiency range cannot be significantly improved further without prohibitive costs .
A hybrid motor design that combines elements of induction and PM technologies could become preferable when applications require both the starting capabilities of induction motors and the high-efficiency operation of PM motors . Such designs are likely to appeal in contexts demanding high efficiency across varying load and speed conditions while minimizing slip and rotor resistance losses typical of pure induction motors . These hybrids may also offer a solution as regulations pressure towards higher efficiency standards that are challenging to meet with traditional motor designs .
China's control over the neodymium supply affects PM motors by escalating magnet prices and restricting sales, which increases costs for manufacturers relying on this resource . This situation encourages other countries to open processing plants, potentially affecting the global competition for magnets . As a result, the higher costs may slow the widespread adoption of PM motors despite their efficiency advantages, making alternative or hybrid motor technologies more appealing .
Incorporating permanent magnets in electric motors improves efficiency by providing a constant magnetic field, which eliminates rotor I2R losses present in induction motors . PM motors often display better power factor and higher overall efficiency compared to induction motors, allowing for enhanced performance at synchronous speeds with reduced slip and energy loss . This incorporation significantly raises the operational efficiency for applications demanding high power density and efficiency .
Switched-reluctance motors operate with a stator that contains windings and a rotor made of soft magnetic material. They use pulses of current to induce magnetic poles in the rotor for torque and rotation . In contrast, synchronous-reluctance motors have an equal number of stator and rotor poles and introduce internal flux barriers to direct magnetic flux. They operate at synchronous speed without the need for magnets or rotor windings, resulting in minimal rotor losses .
In terms of torque and power density, PM motors (salient and nonsalient) lead with the highest densities, followed by synchronous-reluctance, switched-reluctance, and finally induction motors . High torque and power density are crucial for applications requiring compact designs with significant power output, making PM motors suitable for demanding industrial tasks . Conversely, industries that prioritize lower-cost solutions with sufficient performance may prefer induction motors despite their lower torque density .