0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views9 pages

Exception FOR: A Nasa

This document provides a comparison of the theoretical and actual performance of a Nike-Apache sounding rocket firing. It finds that the actual peak altitude was about 3.5 miles lower than the theoretical trajectory in about 100 miles. Other analyses had predicted the theoretical peak to be up to 20 miles higher. The results indicate the Nike-Apache rocket performance is reasonably predictable based on this comparison of one firing.

Uploaded by

uebricc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views9 pages

Exception FOR: A Nasa

This document provides a comparison of the theoretical and actual performance of a Nike-Apache sounding rocket firing. It finds that the actual peak altitude was about 3.5 miles lower than the theoretical trajectory in about 100 miles. Other analyses had predicted the theoretical peak to be up to 20 miles higher. The results indicate the Nike-Apache rocket performance is reasonably predictable based on this comparison of one firing.

Uploaded by

uebricc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

*

EXCEPTION REQUESTED FOR PUBLICATION AS A NASA PiiBLICATION

Lr"

'P

This i s a brief t e c h n i c a l note.

It c o v e r s o n l y one sounding r o c k e t f i r i n g

f o r which s u f f i c i e n t detailed ir?formaticr. w a s a v a i I e b L e t+ w k e a comparison


between t h e o r e t i c a l and a c t u a l performance.

T h i s meager information does n o t

warrant t h e p u b l i c a t i o n as a NASA p u b l i c a t i o n .

However, p o t e n t i a l e x p e r i m e n t e r s

who are l i k e l y t o use t h e Nike-Apache should be p e r m i t t e d t h e o p p o r t u n i t y t o


I

e v a l u a t e t h e r e s u l t s of an actual f i r i n g and e s t a b l i s h t h e degree of p r e d i c t a b i l i t y and, hence, confidence i n t h , i s Sounding Rocket's performance.

?-

- -.

- - _ _

---

--

--

____I

C/COMPARIS.QN OF-T-HEORETI(;AL_~.ACTUALNIKE-APACHE SGLWiDING XGCKET PERFORMANCE_)


D. W. DEMBROW AND L. B. JAMIESON

Introduction

--

The Nike-Apache v e h i c l e ( s e e F i g u r e 1) i s a two-stage

unguided sounding r o c k e t c o n s i s t i n g of a Nike b o o s t e r f o r t h e f i r s t stage and


an Apache second s t a g e .

I t h a s been r e c e n t l y added t o t h e NASA r e p e r t o i r e of

sounding r o c k e t s and d e s c r i b e d i n d e t a i l i n References 1 and 2 .


Nike-Apache, NASA No. 14.108 G I , was f i r e d a t Wallops I s l a n d , V i r g i n i a ,
on March 9 , 1963.

The v e h i c l e was equipped w i t h t e l e m e t r y t u r n s t i l e a n t e n n a e


0

and c a r r i e d a 76 pound payload.

The launcher w a s set a t 108 azimuth and

75.7

e l e v a t i o n t o c o r r e c t . f o r wind, the proposed launch a n g l e being 80

The actual t r a j e c t o r y , as determined from r a d a r p l o t s , w a s compared w i t h


t h e o r e t i c a l trajectories computed f o r t h e Nike-Apache u s i n g t h e given payload,
w e i g h t s , t h r u s t s , and d r a g c o n d i t i o n s .

T h i s comparison i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e
0

e f f e c t i v e launch a n g l e w a s s l i g h t l y more t h a n 83

The a c t u a l t r a j e c t o r y w a s o b t a i n e d by smoothing measurements from two


separate radar plots.

C o r r e c t i o n s were made f o r t h e d i s t a n c e between t h e

r a d a r s i t e s , b u t n o t f o r t h e d i s t a n c e from t h e r a d a r s i t e s t o t h e launch s i t e
(about 1/2 m i l e ) .

The t h e o r e t i c a l t r a j e c t o r y was determined by e x t r a p o l a t i o n

from a s e r i e s of computed t r a j e c t o r i e s having sea l e v e l launch a n g l e s r a n g i n g


0

from 76 t o 82

in 2

i n t e r v a l s t o o b t a i n the 83

launch a n g l e e q u i v a l e n t .

The theoretical t r a j e c t o r i e s were computed u s i n g t h e e q u a t i o n s of motion


a p p l y i n g z e r o - l i f t , no-wind c o n d i t i o n s f o r a s p h e r i c a l , n o n - r o t a t i n g e a r t h

i.e.,

w e i g h t , t h r u s t , and drag.

--

A computer program a p p l y i n g an n - s t a g e two-

d i m e n s i o n a l p o i n t mass method was used on a n IBM 7094 computer t o compute


p o i n t - b y - p o i n t v a l u e s of t h e t h e o r e t i c a l t r a j e c t o r y .
applied :

The f o l l o w i n g c o n d i t i o n s

- 2 -

Phase 1

--

Nike Boost
Gross launch weight

1611.5 pounds

Sea l e v e l launch
Nike burning time

3.5 seconds

Con s t a n t t h r u s t
Constant mass flow rate
Drag d u r i n g burning (see F i g u r e 3 )
S e p a r a t i o n a t end of Nike burning
Phase 2

--

Apache Coasting
Coast f o r 16.5 seconds a f t e r s e p a r a t i o n
Drag d u r i n g c o a s t phase (see F i g u r e 4 )

Phase 3

--

Apache Burning
Weight a t 2nd s t a g e i g n i t i o n

293.5 pounds

I g n i t i o n 20 seconds a f t e r l i f t - o f f
Burning t i m e

6.4 seconds

V a r i a b l e t h r u s t ( see F i g u r e 5)
Drag d u r i n g burning ( s e e F i g u r e 4)
Phase 4

--

Apache Coasting
Drag, same as Phase 2
Atmospheric l i m i t

Results

--

400,000 f e e t ARDC 1959

The r e s u l t s are shown i n F i g u r e 2.

I t can be seen t h a t t h e

a c t u a l and t h e o r e t i c a l t r a j e c t o r i e s d i s a g r e e s l i g h t l y .

The peak a l t i t u d e of

t h e t h e o r e t i c a l t r a j e c t o r y i s h i g h e r than t h e a c t u a l by a b o u t 3 1 / 2 miles i n
a b o u t 100 m i l e s .

The r e s u l t s of o t h e r i n v e s t i g a t o r s who have computed t h e o -

r e t i c a l t r a j e c t o r i e s f o r t h e Nike-Apache Sounding Rocket and t h e i r p r e d i c t e d

- 3 I

a l t i t u d e s a r e a l s o shown i n Figure 2.

The r e s u l t s from Reference 1 would have

p r e d i c t e d about n i n e m i l e s h i g h e r than t h e a c t u a l peak a l t i t u d e .

The results'

estimated from Reference 2 (when a d j u s t e d f o r t h e a d d i t i o n a l d r a g of t u r n s t i l e

antennae) would be around 20 miles higher than t h e a c t u a l peak a l t i t u d e .

Reference 1

--

Nike-Apache Performance Handbook


NASA GSFC X616-62-103

Reference 2

--

Performance Summary f o r t h e Nike-Apache


Sounding Rocket Vehicle
Report No. AST/ElR-00.93
Chance Vought

Under C o n t r a c t NASA-1-1013

11,

L O

:
r-

- i' ,

(3

c-

,-

.,

N O . 3 4 1 D - 1 0 t / a D I E T Z G E N GRAPH PAPER
1 0 X 1 0 PER H A L F I N C H

,/-

'

EUGENE D I E T Z G E N CO.
MADE IN U. 5. A.

'1

-3

i
,

4'

.
n

i'

,'

k-

. \,

'.

You might also like