fix(router): support NgFactory promise in loadChildren typings #29392
Conversation
|
You can preview b1a3cdb at https://pr29392-b1a3cdb.ngbuilds.io/. |
The router loadChildren property already supports a promise that returns a NgModuleFactory, but the typings cause the compilation to fail.
b1a3cdb
to
2e2a8aa
|
You can preview 2e2a8aa at https://pr29392-2e2a8aa.ngbuilds.io/. |
14 tasks
IgorMinar
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2019
thanks!
wKoza
added a commit
to wKoza/angular
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2019
…ar#29392) The router loadChildren property already supports a promise that returns a NgModuleFactory, but the typings cause the compilation to fail. PR Close angular#29392
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.


The router loadChildren property already supports a promise that returnes a NgModuleFactory, but the typings cause the compilation to fail.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
The router loadChildren property already supports a promise that returns a NgModuleFactory, but the typings cause the compilation to fail.
What is the new behavior?
Typings contain the correct supported types.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: