Skip to content

Conversation

@gazorby
Copy link
Contributor

@gazorby gazorby commented Nov 18, 2022

Supplant #1597 and resolves #1549.

@Goldziher
Copy link
Contributor

I guess this needs to be updated @gazorby

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py added Status: Backlog New Integration Integrating with a new framework or library labels Jan 3, 2023
@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @Goldziher and @gazorby ! I ran the test suite and the test for Python 3.7 and 3.8 are failing. Could you have a look: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/actions/runs/3866938112/jobs/6611898016

@gazorby
Copy link
Contributor Author

gazorby commented Jan 9, 2023

Should be fixed now @antonpirker!

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the update!

Now please skip the tests if the starlite package is not installed. Similar like we do in starlette tests: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/blob/master/tests/integrations/starlette/__init__.py (this should fix the failing opentelemetry tests)

And in the test_starlite.py there are some unused imports, please remove them:
https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/actions/runs/3878616735/jobs/6621266350

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

You can run the linters locally by running tox -e linters, or if you do not have tox installed, you can install linter-requirements.txt and then call those commands locally: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/blob/master/tox.ini#L411-L413 (preferably running in Python 3.9 to have the exact same setup like the CI)
(running this locally, should prevent more back and forth)

Copy link
Contributor

@antonpirker antonpirker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First round of review.

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

First @gazorby and @Goldziher: Great work!

I have now created a demo app like this:
Screenshot 2023-01-10 at 17 43 33

When I access the endpoint the error that ends up in Sentry as "generic Starlite request" and I am not sure why not a proper transaction name is set:

Screenshot 2023-01-10 at 17 44 21

Could you please check if you can get a proper name or tell me what I do wrong?

@gazorby
Copy link
Contributor Author

gazorby commented Jan 10, 2023

Should be fixed now @antonpirker

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

I started the tests again, and will review again tomorrow! Thanks for the quick fixes!

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, we have now nice transaction names!

Screenshot 2023-01-11 at 09 58 37

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

All the tests are also green now! Nice work!

The things missing now @gazorby is in my two comments in the review. (One is just nitpicking, so feel free to ignore)

One thing I also noticed is that there is only endpoint in transaction_style. In other integrations we have also url, but most of the time endpoint is the default, so I guess this is fine. If a lot of users demand url style transaction names in the future, we can always add it.

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

One last thing @gazorby . See above!

@gazorby
Copy link
Contributor Author

gazorby commented Jan 11, 2023

@antonpirker As I refactored utils.transaction_from_function to support partials, django.signal_handlers._get_receiver_name
(and maybe other stuff as well) may benefit from it, should we deduplicate here or do this in another PR?

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

please in another PR.

@antonpirker antonpirker merged commit 20c25f2 into getsentry:master Jan 11, 2023
@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

I think we are good to go! Amazing work @gazorby, thanks a lot!

We will try to ship a new version of the SDK this week.

If you send me your shipping address to anton (dot) pirker {at} sentry .dot. io I can send you a little bit of swag as a small "thank you".

@gazorby
Copy link
Contributor Author

gazorby commented Jan 11, 2023

Thanks @antonpirker!

@peterschutt
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @gazorby!

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

antonpirker commented Jan 12, 2023

Starlite support has been released in version 1.13.0 of the Sentry SDK:
https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md

@gazorby
Copy link
Contributor Author

gazorby commented Jan 12, 2023

Thanks for the quick release @antonpirker !

@antonpirker
Copy link
Contributor

No problem! Do not forget to send me your shipping address and t-shirt size to [email protected]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

New Integration Integrating with a new framework or library

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feat] Starlite Integration

5 participants