-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Updated the urllib + http libraries + test libraries #6672
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
3569649 to
b35d242
Compare
Lib/enum.py
Outdated
| # TODO: RUSTPYTHON; Currently, __new__ is not treated specially in __dict__ | ||
| # new_member = __new__.__func__ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what happens without this patch?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whoops! That error was why I added #6658. Now that it's resolved, it should be good to uncomment. I'll give it a shot after I finish testing asyncio
aa54aa7 to
86edf1d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think changes of this file can be in their own PR
ac5387b to
b44d087
Compare
|
Code has been automatically formatted The code in this PR has been formatted using git pull origin update_urllib_http |
bffcbf9 to
9119a2f
Compare
fanninpm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In addition to these in-line comments, I was wondering if the tests currently marked with this:
@unittest.skipIf(os.name == 'nt', 'TODO: RUSTPYTHON; ValueError: illegal environment variable name')…could be replaced with this:
@unittest.expectedFailureIfWindows('TODO: RUSTPYTHON; ValueError: illegal environment variable name')20467ab to
6969ebf
Compare
6969ebf to
d245f9e
Compare
No description provided.