[Scheduler] Throw error on duplicate schedule provider service registration on the schedule name #60253
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
A similar Q&A discussion from last year can be found here |
kbond
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2025
Member
kbond
left a comment
kbond
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice, this makes sense. I agree, let's call this a feature. Can you add an entry to the scheduler's CHANGELOG?
Contributor
Author
|
@kbond Sure! Hope the message within the changelog is OK and detailed enough. |
kbond
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2025
nicolas-grekas
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2025
…ration on the schedule name
Member
|
Thank you @adrianrudnik. |
This was referenced Oct 27, 2025
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The way the schedule providers work, either by tagging a service or using the AsSchedule attribute, can lead to a scenario where multiple ScheduleProviders register for the same schedule name (e.g.
default).The problem arises when the CompilerPass simply overwrites the previously registered one without throwing a warning, a notice or anything else. The problem would be that a full ScheduleProvider would simply not register and therefore not run.
I decided to use the InvalidArgumentException from DI, as I could not get a trigger_error on E_USER_WARNING to show anything in a
devenvironment, in case I miss a scenario where this would actually be a desirable use case.Not sure if the test is complete enough for this scenario. I tried to base it on others found in HttpKernel.
Also not sure if this falls under "feature" or "bug fix", so I marked it as a feature above.