Message 386701 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	avrahami.ben
Recipients	avrahami.ben, levkivskyi, rectalogic, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2021-02-09.09:57:06
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
The patch PR blocks out a useful idiom: generic Nametuple >>> class LLNode(NamedTuple, Generic[T]): ... value :T ... next: Optional[LLNode[T]] I put forward that, at the least, NamedTuple should accept do-nothing bases like Generic.

The patch PR blocks out a useful idiom: generic Nametuple

>>> class LLNode(NamedTuple, Generic[T]):
...     value :T
...     next: Optional[LLNode[T]]

I put forward that, at the least, NamedTuple should accept do-nothing bases like Generic.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-02-09 09:57:06	avrahami.ben	set	recipients: + avrahami.ben, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, levkivskyi, rectalogic
2021-02-09 09:57:06	avrahami.ben	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2021-02-09 09:57:06	avrahami.ben	link	issue36517 messages
2021-02-09 09:57:06	avrahami.ben	create