Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

State judicial elections, 2026

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
2026 State
Judicial Elections
2027 »
« 2025
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Overview
Supreme Courts Overview
Appellate Courts Overview
View judicial elections by state:

A total of 303 appellate court seats are up for election in 2026. The seats include:

  • 65 supreme court seats
  • 238 intermediate appellate court seats

Ballotpedia provides coverage of supreme court and intermediate appellate court elections, as well as local trial court elections for judges within the 100 largest cities in the United States as measured by population.

On this page, you will find:

Click here for information on state supreme court elections. Click here for information on state intermediate appellate court elections. Click here for information on local trial court elections.

State supreme court offices up for election in 2026

See also: State supreme court elections, 2026

Click the tabs below to view information about the elections this year. In this section, you will find:

  • A list of seats up for election
  • A list of candidates running
  • Ballotpedia's Sample Ballot Lookup Tool

The following states are holding an election for a state supreme court seat in 2026. This list is subject to change if judges retire or are appointed.



2026 State Supreme Court Elections
StateSeats up for electionElection method
Alabama3Partisan
Alaska1Retention
Arizona1Retention
Arkansas2Nonpartisan
California2Retention
Colorado1Retention
Florida1Retention
Georgia3Nonpartisan
Idaho2Nonpartisan
Kansas2Retention
Kentucky1Nonpartisan
Louisiana3Partisan
Maryland1Retention
Michigan2Partisan
Minnesota3Nonpartisan
Missouri1Retention
Montana1Nonpartisan
Nevada2Nonpartisan
New Mexico2Retention
North Carolina1Partisan
North Dakota2Nonpartisan
Ohio2Partisan
Oklahoma6Retention
Oregon1Nonpartisan
South Dakota1Retention
Tennessee1Retention
Texas7Partisan
Utah2Retention
Washington4Nonpartisan
West Virginia2Nonpartisan
Wisconsin1Nonpartisan
Wyoming1Retention


State intermediate court offices up for election in 2026

See also: State intermediate appellate court elections, 2026

Click the tabs below to view information about the elections this year. In this section, you will find:

  • A list of seats up for election
  • A list of candidates running
  • Ballotpedia's Sample Ballot Lookup Tool

The following states are holding elections for intermediate appellate court seats in 2026. This list is subject to change if judges retire or are appointed.



2026 state intermediate appellate court elections
StateSeats up for electionElection method
Alabama4Partisan
Arizona17Retention
Arkansas2Nonpartisan
California49Retention
Colorado6Retention
Florida22Retention
Georgia5Nonpartisan
Idaho1Nonpartisan
Illinois8Partisan and retention
Indiana4Retention
Iowa3Retention
Kansas7Retention
Kentucky1Nonpartisan
Louisiana3Partisan
Maryland1Retention
Michigan10Nonpartisan
Minnesota6Nonpartisan
Mississippi5Nonpartisan
Missouri7Retention
Nebraska1Retention
New Mexico2Retention
North Carolina3Partisan
Ohio20Partisan
Oklahoma4Retention
Oregon4Nonpartisan
Tennessee2Retention
Texas24Partisan
Utah6Retention
Washington7Nonpartisan
West Virginia1Nonpartisan
Wisconsin3Nonpartisan


Judicial selection methods

See also: Judicial selection in the states

Methods of judicial selection vary substantially across the United States.[1] Though each state has a unique set of guidelines governing how they fill their state and local judiciaries, there are five main methods. Two methods are primarily election-based; three methods are primarily appointment-based.

Election-based methods

  • Partisan elections: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot alongside a label designating political party affiliation.
  • Nonpartisan elections: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot without a label designating party affiliation.

Appointment-based methods

  • Gubernatorial appointment: Judges are appointed by the governor. In some cases, approval from the legislative body is required.
  • Assisted appointment, also known as merit selection or the Missouri Plan: A nominating commission reviews the qualifications of judicial candidates and submits a list of names to the governor, who appoints a judge from the list. After serving an initial term, judges typically run in a yes-no retention election to remain on the court.[2] At the state supreme court level, this selection method is further divided into three types. Click here to learn more.
  • Legislative elections: Judges are selected by the state legislature.

States may apply more than one of the five methods across different levels of courts. For example, a state may choose its appellate court judges by assisted appointment while choosing its trial court judges in partisan elections. Some states may even select judges of the same court level differently depending on the population of an area or local opinion.[1][2] States may also modify any of the systems above in their own way. The assisted appointment method, in particular, comes in a variety of forms. For instance, some states require the governor to choose from the commission's list of nominees, while in other states the list is only a suggestion.[1]

Types of courts

Depending on your state, judges from several different types of courts may appear on the ballot, each with different jurisdictions. There are four types of courts, listed here in ascending order of jurisdiction:

  1. Limited jurisdiction courts
  2. General jurisdiction courts
  3. Intermediate appellate courts
  4. Courts of last resort

Limited jurisdiction courts

Limited jurisdiction is a term used to describe courts with legal authority restricted to specific subjects, cases, or persons. Examples of limited jurisdiction courts include family courts, traffic courts, probate courts, and military courts.[3] Forty-six states have limited jurisdiction courts. Washington, D.C., and four states (California, Illinois, Iowa, and Minnesota) do not have such courts.[4] Rather, their general jurisdiction courts are assigned cases that might normally have been given to a limited jurisdiction court.

General jurisdiction courts

General jurisdiction is a term used to describe courts that do not have limits on the type of cases they can hear. Cases typically originate in general jurisdiction courts, and their decisions can be appealed to intermediate appellate courts. All 50 states and Washington, D.C., have general jurisdiction courts. General jurisdiction courts are sometimes referred to as trial courts or district courts.

Intermediate appellate courts

See also: State intermediate appellate court elections, 2026

Intermediate appellate courts, as their name suggests, serve as an intermediate step between the trial courts and the courts of last resort in a state. Their jurisdiction varies from state to state.

Forty-two states have at least one intermediate appellate court. Some states have more than one of these types of courts. For example, Alabama has one intermediate appellate court for civil matters and another for criminal matters. Pennsylvania's superior court and commonwealth court are both appellate courts but have different jurisdictions. Other states, such as Illinois and California, have multiple divisions of intermediate appellate courts with varying degrees of independence from each other. Intermediate appellate courts are sometimes called courts of appeal.

Courts of last resort

See also: State supreme court elections, 2026

A state court of last resort is the highest judicial body within a jurisdiction's court system. It is a court with the highest appellate authority, meaning that its rulings are not subject to review by any other court in the state. A court of last resort is often, but not always, referred to as a supreme court.[5]

All 50 states and Washington, D.C., have at least one court of last resort. Oklahoma and Texas both have two courts of last resort, one for civil appeals and one for criminal appeals.

Incumbent win rates

Click the tabs below to view information about incumbent win rates in state supreme court elections over time. In this section, you will find:

  • Win rates by year
  • Win rates in partisan elections
  • Win rates in nonpartisan elections
  • Win rates in retention elections
  • Win rates by state

Across all types of state supreme court elections, incumbent justices running for re-election won 92% of the time from 2008 to 2025. The year when the most incumbents lost was 2024, when eight incumbents did not win re-election. The year with the lowest re-election rate was 2015, when out of two justices, only one (50%) was re-elected. In years where more justices were running, the year with the lowest re-election rate was 2024, when 85% of justices were re-elected..

Incumbent win rates in state supreme court elections (2008-2025)
Election yearTotal incumbent electionsIncumbent elections wonIncumbent elections lostIncumbent win rate
2025330100%
20247264885%
20230
20227875394%
20210
20207065592%
20190
20185953687%
2017440100%
20166562395%
201521150%
20147371298%
2013220100%
20126863590%
2011220100%
20106862693%
2009110100%
20086357690%
TOTAL6305854592%

Historical election data

There were 1,610 state judicial elections held from 2016 to 2024.

State judicial elections, 2016-2024
YearCourt of last resort seatsIntermediate appellate court seatsTotal
202483221304
202321315
202284298384
202111415
202078201279
201931417
201868244312
201741721
201676189265
Total3991,2111,610

Courts of last resort

Retention

From 2016 to 2024, retention elections took place for 53 judicial seats on courts of last resort. All but two of those judges were retained.

Non-retention

There were 246 non-retention elections held from 2016 to 2024, with 153 races contested (62.2%). Incumbents ran for re-election 74.7% of the time. Of the incumbents who ran for re-election, 87.4% won re-election.

The table below is organized by year and includes the total number of seats up for election, the number of contested seats, the number and percentage of incumbents who sought re-election, the number and percentage of incumbents who faced opposition, and the number and percentage of incumbents who won another term.

Court of last resort elections, 2016-2024
YearTotal seatsSeats contestedIncumbents who
sought re-election
% incumbents who
sought re-election
Incumbents who
faced opposition
% incumbents who
faced opposition
Incumbents who
were re-elected
% incumbents who
were re-elected
202454264277.8%1740.5%3583.3%
20232200%00%00%
202248303470.8%2161.8%3294.1%
20211100.0%00.0%00.0%
202049374183.7%2970.7%3687.8%
20193300.0%00.0%00.0%
201845253475.6%1955.9%2882.4%
2017212100%150.0%2100%
201642283173.8%1754.8%2890.3%
Total24615318474.8%10456.5%16187.5%

Intermediate appellate courts

Retention

From 2016 to 2024, retention elections took place for 510 judicial seats on intermediate appellate courts. All were retained.

Non-retention

There were 701 non-retention elections from 2016 to 2024, with 297 races contested (42.4%). Incumbents ran for re-election 81.7% of the time. Of the incumbents who ran for re-election, 84.0% won re-election.

The table below is organized by year and includes the total number of seats up for election, the number of contested seats, the number and percentage of incumbents who sought re-election, the number and percentage of incumbents who faced opposition, and the number and percentage of incumbents who won another term.

Intermediate appellate court elections, 2016-2024
YearTotal seatsSeats contestedIncumbents who
sought re-election
% incumbents who
sought re-election
Incumbents who
faced opposition
% incumbents who
faced opposition
Incumbents who
were re-elected
% incumbents who
were re-elected
20241426111681.7%4034.5%9077.6%
2023113763.6%114.3%685.7%
20221485111477.0%2925.4%10390.4%
2021105550.0%360.0%360.0%
2020117579379.5%3739.8%8490.3%
2019107550.0%00.0%5100.0%
20181426911278.9%4439.3%8273.2%
20171611637.5%350.0%466.7%
2016105338581.0%2023.5%7992.9%
Total70129754377.5%17732.6%45684.0%

See also

External links

Footnotes